Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2377-4304

Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal

Research Article Volume 15 Issue 6

Placental abruption: a five-year review of prevalence, risk factors and foeto-maternal outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria

Onah Livinus Nnanyelugo, Ezenwaeze Malachy Nwaeze, Ortuanya Kelvin Emeka

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Correspondence: Ezenwaeze Malachy Nwaeze, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, Tel +2348068092381

Received: November 16, 2024 | Published: November 27, 2024

Citation: Nnanyelugo OL, Nwaeze EM, Emeka OK. Placental abruption: a five-year review of prevalence, risk factors and foeto-maternal outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2024;15(6):278-282. DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2024.15.00772

Download PDF

Abstract

Background: Placental abruption is one of the major causes of antepartum haemorrhage with high propensity to cause maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality.

Objective: This study assessed the prevalence, risk factors and foeto-maternal outcomes of placental abruption at the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), South-East Nigeria.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all cases of placental abruption managed from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2023 in the Labor ward of ESUT Teaching Hospital, Enugu State, Nigeria. Data were analysis with Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (IBM Chicago) version 28. Categorical variables were presented in frequencies and percentages while symmetrical continuous variables were presented using mean and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals around the point estimates.

Results: Over the 5-year study period, 10,020 deliveries, and one hundred and seventy-one (171) cases of placental abruption were observed, giving the prevalence of placental abruption at 1.71% or 17.1per 1000 deliveries. The mean (SD) age and gestational age were 33.5 (±4.5) years and 37.9 (±2.3) weeks respectively. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (58%), abdominal trauma (15%), retro placental uterine masses (13%), premature rupture of membranes (12%) and previous history of placental abruption (2%) were the isolated risk factors to placental abruption. Three cases of maternal death (2%) occurred and increased operative delivery (74%) and blood transfusion (40%) were the commonest maternal complications while prematurity (38%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (58%) were the fetal complications observed.

Conclusion: The prevalence of placental abruption in ESUTH is 1.71%; with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy being the most predisposing risk factor. Measures to prevent and effectively manage hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are advocated to change the burden of placental abruption.

Keywords: placental abruption, prevalence, risk factors, outcomes, ESUTH

Introduction

Placental abruption also called abruptio placentae is a dire obstetric emergency that is defined as the partial or total separation of a normally sited placenta after the age of viability but before the delivery of the fetus.1,2 Placental abruption is one of the major causes of antepartum haemorrhage and is associated with high maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality.3,4 placental abruption is classified in many forms; mild or sever depending on whether the foetus is alive or dead, revealed, concealed or mixed, depending on if the bleeding is visible from the genital tract, not visible from the tract or both.5 The concealed type is particularly dangerous because the degree of blood loss does not correlate with maternal vital signs and also has been noted to have higher fetal death compared to the revealed type.6 It is also graded from 0 to 3 based on the severity of clinical presentation. Grade 0 is asymptomatic but retroplacental clot is found during delivery; Grade 1 presents with mild symptom, grade 2 presents with moderate symptom while Grade 3 is associated with moderate to severe symptoms in addition to intrauterine fetal death. When grade 3 is associated with coagulopathy, it is termed 3A and without coagulopathy, 3B.7

The incidence of placental abruption in developed countries is about 1% of all deliveries, whereas in developing countries it is around 2-8%.8 Its occurrence in about 0.6%–1% of pregnancies has also been reported.9 Predisposing factors to placental abruption include previous episode of placental abruption(most predictive), hypertensive heart diseases ( such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, chronic hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia), cigarette smoking, cocaine use, multiparity, young women (<20 years), advanced maternal age (>35 years), uterine over distension (multiple pregnancy, polyhydramnios), uterine anomalies, retroplacental uterine leiomyoma, blunt abdominal trauma, premature rupture of membrane, short umbilical cord, abnormal presentation, external cephalic version, polyhydramnios, and thrombophilic disorder.10,11

The clinical presentation of placental abruption will include vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, uterine and abdominal tenderness, preterm labor, evidence of hemodynamic instability, fetal distress, and fetal death.12 The clinical picture in a patient with placental abruption depends on the extent of placental separation and the quantity of vaginal bleeding (whether revealed or concealed).

The diagnosis of placental abruption is largely clinical. Ultrasound is only disposed to excluding placenta Previa since it is insensitive for diagnosis,13 due to similar isoechoic appearance of recent retroplacental hematoma with that of the placenta on ultrasonography.14 Diagnosis is confirmed at delivery by direct visualization of retroplacental clots and indentation of the maternal surface of the placenta.15

Complications like postpartum hemorrhage, shock, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, oliguria, anuria and acute kidney injury, increased incidence of operative interference, puerperal sepsis, lactation failure can occur in the mother while fetal complications will include fetal distress, low birth weight, preterm delivery, asphyxia, perinatal death and intrauterine fetal demise.16,17 There are paucity of data on placental abruption in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital. Hospital necessitating this study which aimed at determining the prevalence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes of placental abruption in ESUTH, Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Study design

A retrospective cross-sectional study. The study population was pregnant women that had placental abruption and were managed from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2023 in the Labour ward of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Enugu State University Teaching Hospital is a tertiary health facility in the capital of Enugu State, South-East Nigeria with different cadres of professionals. It is located in the North of Enugu metropolis and serves as a training centre for undergraduate medical students and postgraduate resident doctors as well as a referral center for secondary health care centers and other government owned and private Hospitals in Enugu and neighboring States. Its central location and the efficient medical services delivery in the hospital made it an institution of choice for many patients in the state and its environs.

The total number of deliveries during the review period was obtained from the labour ward and theatre registers. A well designed proforma was used to collect data on sociodemographic/obstetric factors, risk factors, and foeto-maternal outcomes.

Placental abruption is defined as premature separation of normally sited placenta after the period of foetal viability, which is 28 weeks in our setting.18 Diagnosis was made based on risk factors, clinical features and examination findings on the patients like bleeding per vaginam, abdominal pain, woody hard abdomen and finding of retroplacental cloth following delivery of placenta.

Data collected were analysis with Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (IBM Chicago) version 28. Categorical variables were presented in frequencies and percentages while symmetrical continuous variables were presented using mean and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals around the point estimates.

Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the hospital.

Results

About 167 deliveries occur per month in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital with cumulative of 10,020 deliveries and 171 cases of placental abruption over the 5 years of study, giving the prevalence of placental abruption at 1.71% or 17.1 per 1000 deliveries. The mean (SD) age and gestational age were 33.5 (±4.5) years and 37.9 (±2.3) weeks respectively.

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic and obstetrics characteristics of the study participants. Majority of the research participants 72(42%) were between 30-34years of age. The majority of participants (40%) had secondary level of education, followed by 36% who had tertiary level of education and the least number 24% had primary education. Ninety-five (95%) were Christian while 5% were non-Christian. Greater number, 57% had their pregnancy unbooked while only 43% booked for antenatal care in the hospital. Also, more than half 106 (62%) were multiparous parturient

Variables

Number n=171

Percentage

Age (years)

<20

2

1.2

20-24

5

2.9

25-29

36

21

30-34

72

42

35-39

48

28

>40

8

4.7

Mean age 33.5

SD 4.5

95%CL:33.4,35.8

Mean GA 37.9

SD 2.3

95%CL:34.6,37.3

Parity

Primipara (1)

60

35

Multipara (2-4)

106

62

Grand multipara(≥5)

5

2.9

Religion

Variable

Percentage

Christian

162

95

Non-Christian

9

5

Educational status

Primary

41

24

Secondary

68

40

Tertiary

62

36

Booking status

Booked

73

43

Unbooked

98

57

Table 1 Sociodemographic/obstetric characteristics of the study participants

The commonest risk factor for abruption among the studied parturient was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and this was noticed in 99(58%) of them. Others were abdominal trauma (15%), retroplacental uterine masses (13%), premature rupture of membrane (12%) and previous abruption (2%) as seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Risk factors to placental abruption.

Increased operative delivery was the commonest maternal complication observed 126(74%). The next was the need for blood transfusion 68(40%), followed by Postpartum haemorrhage 15(9%), Postpartum anaemia 26(15%), puerperal sepsis 5(3%) and maternal death 3(2%) (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Maternal complications of placental abruption.

Majority of the foetuses were delivered preterm 65(38%), out of which 55(32%) had low birth weight. Other complications include, birth asphyxia in 38(22%), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission 99(58%) and stillbirth in 51(30%) as depicted in Figure 3 below.

Figure 3 Foetal outcomes/complications.

Discussion

Placental abruption is one of the major causes of antepartum haemorrhage with high propensity to cause maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality.3,4 The prevalence of placental abruption at the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital is 1.71% or 17.1 per 1000 deliveries. This finding is similar to the finding of 1.1%,19 and 1.4%20 reported in North central, and Ghana respectively but higher than 0.5% reported in a previous study,21 0.3% reported in Tanzania,22 0.48% in a study done in Rivers State,18 0.8% in South East Nigeria23 and 0.34%24 in another study. The high prevalence of abruption placentae in the index study could be due to good recording/record keeping and variation in the number of cases as the institution serves a referral center due to its central location and prompt /efficient service delivery. In the study done in River state where the prevalence of abruption placentae was reported at 0.48, 68 cases of abruption were discovered over the six years of study as against 171 cases of abruption found in the index five-year study. Similar high value of 2.2% was equally reported in Newi which incidentally shared similar characteristics of being a referral centre like Enugu State University Teaching Hospital. The mean ±SD age of the participants was 33.5 SD ±4.5 and the modal age group was 35-39 years. Multiparous women had more cases of abruption placentae compared with primiparous and grand multiparous women just as documented in previous studies.25,26 Similarly, more cases of abruption were found among older women than the younger age affirming the role of increased age in abruption. This finding aligned with similar documented findings in literature.27,28 Majority (57 %) of the participants did not book for antenatal care(ANC) just as found in the study done in Enugu and Anambra, south east Nigeria23,29 and another in south west Nigeria28 but contrary to the findings of studies done in River State18 and another in Ramaiah medical college and hospitals, Bangalore, India30 where majority of the studied parturient booked for antenatal care. Enugu State University Teaching Hospital is a referral centre and this could have accounted for high number of unbooked cases in parturients with abruptio placentae.

Concerning the risk factors of abruption placentae, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were the commonest risk factor for abruption placentae identified among the study parturient, accounting for 58% of cases studied. This aligned with the previous studies.18,29,31 Other risk factors identified were abdominal trauma, retro placental uterine masses, premature rupture of membranes and previous history of abruption placentae, corroborating the findings of previous studies.26,32

Increased operative delivery (emergency caesarean delivery) was the commonest maternal complication found in the index study, accounting for 78% of the cases. This was the case in those with live babies since it is the recommended mode of delivery to ensue good fetal outcome. The remaining 23% cases had vaginal delivery and they were both cases of mild abruptio incidentally diagnosed following observation of retro placental clot pospartum and those cases of abruptio with dead babies in relatively stable parturient. This corroborates findings of previous studies.18,32 Increased tendencies for blood transfusion is the second commonest maternal complication observed in 40% of the parturient. Similar need for blood transfusion was noted by felix et al that observed rate of 43.9%18 and Abasi et al that observed transfusion rate of 66.7% among women with abruptio placentae.33 Other maternal complications observed in this study were postpartum haemorrhage, postpartum anaemia, puerperal sepsis and maternal death. Maternal death was noted in 2% of the study parturient unlike in the study of felix et al that noted no maternal death.18 These cases of deaths occurred in unbooked patients that presented late to the hospital in a very critical condition highlighting the need for early presentation in all cases of antepartum haemorrhage since some of the cases of abruption could be concealed making the degree of the bleeding not to be an obvious reflection of morbidity in the patient. Puerperal sepsis occurred in 3% of cases and this corroborated with rate of 3.7 % found by Felix et al in Rivers state18 and Adewole et al in Abuja all in Nigeria.34 Majority of the foetuse 119 (70%) were live births while 51(30%) were stillbirth. This is similar to 52.9% and 41.6% reported by Siddiqui et al in Karachi35 and Abbasi et al in Pakistan36 but lower than stillbirth rate of 4 (5.6%) reported by felix et al in River State.18 Over two-third of cases of stillbirth was noted among unbooked parturient. The most common foetal outcome was admission into the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) which accounted for 47.4%. Other observed adverse foetal outcomes were birth asphyxia, prematurity and low birth weight. These findings corroborated those of previous studies.18,37

Conclusion

The prevalence of placental abruption at Enugu State Teaching Hospital is 1.71% with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy being the most common risk factor. Increased operative delivery and blood transfusion were the commonest maternal complications while prematurity and NICU admission were the cases in the foetus. Measures to prevent and effectively manage hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is advocated to change the burden of placental abruption.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the efforts of all staff in the labour ward, theatre and medical record for good record keeping and assistance in folder retrieval.

Funding

No external funding outside the authors.

Conflicts of interest

Authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. Akadri AA, Ogunsowo KM, Odelola OI. Abruptio Placenta: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:142-146.
  2.  Adeniran AS, Elegbua CO, Ezeoke GG, et al. Abruptio placentae: Epidemiology and pregnancy outcome in a low-resource setting. Port Harcourt Med J. 2018;12:131-135.
  3. Mukherjee S, Bawa AK, Sharma S, et al. Retrospective study of risk factors and maternal and fetal outcome in patients with abruptio placentae. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(2):425-428.
  4. Macheku GS, Philemon RN, Oneko O, et al. Frequency, risk factors and feto-maternal outcomes of abruptio placentae in Northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):242.
  5. Okafor II. Antepartum Haemorrhage. In: Umeora OUJ, Egbuji C.C, Onyebuchi AK, editors. ST Our Teachers- A Comprehensive Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1st edn. Benedict Printing and Publishing; 2017:205-208.
  6. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1005-1016.
  7. Richa S. Antepartum Haemorrhage. Bedside Obstetrics and Gyecology. New Delhi: JAYPEE Brothers Medical publishers (p) Ltd; 2014:187-221.
  8. Sayli W, Meenal S. A clinical study of maternal and perinatal outcome of abruptio placentae. JMSCR. 2019;7(6):351-357.
  9. JanakiramP, Sellathamry SG, Ponnivalavan K. Maternal and perinatal outcome in abruptio placenta. JEvid BasedMed Healthc. 2017;4:3985-3988.
  10. Okafor II: Antepartum Haemorrhage. In: Umeora OUJ, Egbuji C.C, Onyebuchi AK, editors. Our Teachers- A Comprehensive Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1st edn. Benedict Printing and Publishing; 2017:205-208.
  11. Khan S, Chughani G, Amir F, et al. Frequency of abruptio placenta in women with pregnancyinduced hypertension. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21524.
  12. Wagner SA. Third trimester vaginal bleeding. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, Roman AS, editors. CurrentDiagnosis & Treatment Obstetric & Gynaecologic, 11th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013:310-313.
  13. JanakiramP, Sellathamry SG, Ponnivalavan K. Maternal and perinatal outcome in abruptio placenta. JEvid BasedMed Healthc. 2017;4:3985-3988.
  14. Shinde GR, Vaswani BP, Patange RP, et al. Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for detection of abruption and its clinical correlation and maternal and foetal outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:4-7.
  15. Akadri AA, Ogunsowo KM, Odelola OI. Abruptio Placenta: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:142-146.
  16. Desai N, Patel B. Study of a fetomaternal outcome in cases of abruptio placentae. International Journal of Scientifi Research. 2016;5(11):186-188.
  17. Mangla S, Malhotra V, Nanda S, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome in abruptio placentae. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicines & Dental Care. 2017;4 (1).
  18. Felix CC Wekere, Nestor M Inimgba, Juliana OC, et al. Placental abruption at a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Nigeria: a six-year review of prevalence, trend and sociodemographic characteristics. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies. 2023;3(4):760–764.
  19. Attah R, Aisha A. Outcome of pregnancies complicated by abruptio placentae in Kano, Nigeria: A 5-year review. Ibom Medical Journal. 2017;10(2):27-34.
  20. Coleman J, Srofenyo EK, Ofori EK, et al. Maternal and fetal prognosis in abruptio placentae at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18(4):115-122.
  21. Sengodan SS, Dhanapal M. Abruptio placenta: a retrospective study on maternal and perinatal outcome. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;6(10):4389-4393.
  22. Macheku GS, Philemon RN, Oneko O, et al. Frequency, risk factors and feto-maternal outcomes of abruptio placentae in Northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1-10.
  23. Igwegbe A, Eleje G, Okpala B. Management outcomes of abruptio placentae at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2013;22(3):234-238.
  24. Attah R, Aisha A. Outcome of pregnancies complicated by abruptio placentae in Kano, Nigeria: A 5-year review. Ibom Medical Journal. 2017;10(2):27-34.
  25. Ghaheh HS, Feizi A, Mousavi M, et al. Risk factors of placental abruption. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(5):422-426.
  26.  Martinelli KG, Garcia ÉM, Santos Neto ETd, et al. Advanced maternal age and its association with placenta praevia and placental abruption: a meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(2):e00206116.
  27. Mukherjee S, Bawa AK, Sharma S, et al. Retrospective study of risk factors and maternal and fetal outcome in patients with abruptio placentae. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(2):425-428.
  28. Akadri AA, Ogunsowo KM, Odelola OI. Abruptio Placenta: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:142-146.
  29. Charlotte B, Ezenwafor OO, Eleje GU, et al. Feto-maternal outcome of abruptio placentae in a Tertiary Hospital in Nnewi, Nigeria. Int J Obst & Gyn. 2023;3(1):1‒5.
  30. Fernandes J, Gopalakrishna N. Maternal and fetal outcome in abruptio placentae at a tertiary care centre: a retrospective analysis. Int J Reproduct Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10:3860-3863.
  31. Hossain N, Khan N, Sultana SS, et al. Abruptio placenta and adverse pregnancy outcome. Hypertension. 2010;13:16.
  32. Wekere FCC, Kua PL, Akani AB, et al. Prevalence, maternal and perinatal sequelae of antepartum haemorrhage in a tertiary hospital in south-south, Nigeria. International journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021;5(5):206-210.
  33. Abasi I, Jeremiah I, Ekine A. Risk factors and pregnancy outcome of placental abruption at the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, South-south Nigeria. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. 2015;5(8):1000-1006.
  34. Adewole N, Isah AD, Osinachi IF. Foeto-maternal outcome of abruptio placentae at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. African Journal of medical and health sciences. 2019;18(3):18-24.
  35. Siddiqui SA, Tariq G, Soomro N, et al. Perinatal outcome and near-miss morbidity between placenta previa versus abruptio placentae. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21(2):79-83.
  36. Abbasi RM, Rizwan N, Mumtaz F, et al. Feto maternal outcome among Abruptio placentae cases at a University hospital of Sindh.
    JLUMHS. 2008;2:106-109.
  37. Atta AA, Abdullahi IH. Abruptio placentae: incidence and pregnancy outcome in a tertiary health centre in Abuja, Nigeria: A 4 year review. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 2018;1:5.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Nnanyelugo, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.