Submit manuscript...
MOJ
eISSN: 2574-9935

Sports Medicine

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 2

Effects of a post- activation performance enhancement protocol combined with blood flow restriction at submaximal 1rm percentages on countermovement jump performance

Josep Manel Serrano-Ramon, Jorge Giménez- Meseguer

Faculty of Humanities and Sciences social studies, Universidad Isabel I, Burgos, Spain
Department of General Didactics and Specific Didactics, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante Alicante, Spain

Received: August 25, 2026 | Published: September 18, 2026

Citation: Serrano-Ramon JM, Giménez- Meseguer J. Effects of a post- activation performance enhancement protocol combined with blood flow restriction at submaximal 1rm percentages on countermovement jump performance. MOJ Sports Med. 2026;9(2):83‒88. DOI: 10.15406/mojsm.2026.09.00204

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose: Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) is a strategy used to acutely enhance explosive performance; however, the effectiveness of combining it with blood flow restriction (BFR) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of a PAPE protocol based on back squat exercise (90% 1RM) combined with different levels of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) (80% and 100%) on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Methods: Seven resistance-trained athletes completed a randomized, repeated-measures crossover design across three conditions: (1) without occlusion (WO), (2) 80% AOP, and (3) 100% AOP. The conditioning activity consisted of two sets of two repetitions of the back squat at 90% 1RM. Jump height (HGT), power output (POT), and Reactive Strength Index (RSI) were assessed 5 min post-activation using a contact platform. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOV A. Results: Significant main effects were observed for HGT, POT, and RSI (all p ≤ 0.011). Post hoc comparisons indicated that only the 100% AOP condition differed significantly from WO (p ≤ 0.042); the 80% AOP condition did not differ significantly from either WO or 100% AOP. Effect sizes were large for all variables (ηp² = 0.53 for HGT and RSI; ηp² = 0.61 for POT), with the greatest responses observed in the 100% AOP condition. Conclusions: The incorporation of complete blood flow restriction (100% AOP) into a high-load PAPE protocol (90% 1RM) may enhance acute neuromuscular performance during explosive tasks such as the countermovement jump in resistance-trained athletes, whereas partial occlusion (80% AOP) did not produce a statistically detectable benefit over no occlusion in this sample.

Keywords: post-activation performance enhancement; blood flow restriction; countermovement jump; reactive strength index; resistance training.

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2026 Serrano-Ramon, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.