Resist-dyed textiles, particularly ikat, have become essential markers of national identity in Central Asia, symbolizing rich cultural heritage and artistic expression. This paper employs a qualitative, interdisciplinary approach rooted in historical and cultural analysis, drawing from scholarly literature, archival data, and contemporary practice. The study’s key contribution is its nuanced exploration of how resist-dyed textiles reflect Central Asia’s multifaceted historical trajectory, shaped by Silk Road exchanges, nomadic traditions, and Soviet industrialization, and how they are being reimagined in contemporary nation-building efforts, especially in Uzbekistan. The article also analyzes the resurgence of ikat following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, situating its revival within broader debates on authenticity, globalization, and cultural appropriation. Furthermore, the study addresses how contemporary artists and designers engage with ikat to navigate identity and postcolonial belonging. Lastly, it examines challenges such as industrialization and fast fashion that threaten the sustainability of traditional textile practices. This research is further enriched by a comparative analysis of resist-dyed textile traditions globally,^1,2 emphasizing the universal yet locally adapted meanings of such practices. By exploring these dynamics, the paper offers an original contribution to studies of intangible heritage and cultural identity in Central Asia.

Keywords: ikat, adras, Central Asia, post-Soviet recovery, national identity

Intangible cultural heritage encompasses oral traditions, rituals, artistic practices, and craftsmanship passed down through generations, forming the foundation of cultural identity. In Uzbekistan, intangible heritage includes dance and vocal storytelling traditions, culinary customs, and artisanal crafts, among which resist-dyed textile production (adras, abrabandi, shoyi, ikat) holds particular significance.

Despite its cultural importance, the role of resist-dyed textiles, particularly adras, in the formation of Uzbek national identity remains underexplored, especially concerning the impacts of colonial, Soviet, and post-Soviet transitions and contemporary globalization. This article addresses this gap by investigating the evolution of adras through historical, socio-economic, and cultural perspectives. Drawing on the insights of scholars like Dick³ and Edwards,⁴ the study explores how cultural policies, global trade, and local artisan practices interact in the modern revival of adras. The study aims to answer the following research questions: How did adras develop in response to successive political regimes? What symbolic and practical roles does it play in contemporary cultural identity formation? And how do issues of authenticity, commercialization, and cultural appropriation influence its modern revival?

Since today the active tradition of resist-dyed textiles exists almost exclusively in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, this study limits its scope to the Uzbek case, where the craft has undergone a particularly significant revival. Historically, adras weaving flourished in the Fergana Valley, becoming an integral part of urban craft traditions. Over the centuries, this textile has undergone multiple transformations due to colonial influences, Soviet industrialization, and global market forces. The evolution of adras mirrors broader shifts in Uzbek identity, from its artisanal roots to its reemergence as a national symbol in the post-Soviet era.

This article explores adras as a vital element of Uzbekistan’s intangible heritage, offering both historical analysis and engagement with contemporary debates. It highlights the enduring relevance of traditional textile practices as a means of cultural negotiation in a rapidly globalizing world.

This study applies a qualitative, interdisciplinary methodology that intersects cultural history, fashion sociology, and critical heritage studies. It is structured as a literature-based analysis supported by historical and visual documentation. Sources were selected for their relevance to three key thematic axes:

1. The historical trajectory of textile production in the Ferghana Valley^5,6
2. Theoretical frameworks around material culture and Orientalism^7,8
3. This study applies a qualitative, interdisciplinary methodology that intersects cultural history, fashion sociology, and critical heritage studies.

It is structured as a literature-based analysis supported by historical and visual documentation. Sources were selected for their relevance to four key thematic axes:

1. The historical trajectory of textile production in the Ferghana Valley^5,6
2. Theoretical frameworks around material culture and Orientalism^7,8
3. Global comparative studies on textile traditions and heritage preservation^1,2,4
4. Digital and cultural heritage preservation^9,10

The study places special emphasis on the period of Soviet influence and post-Soviet cultural revitalization, situating the evolution of adras within broader narratives of nation-building and identity politics.

Primary materials include archival reports, academic literature, and visual analyses of textiles and fashion collections. Contextual insights are supported by institutional reports and public-facing commentary, especially from the Central Asia Analytical Network. The study emphasizes the Soviet and post-Soviet periods as critical junctures in the transformation of textile identity. This integrative approach allows for the mapping of continuity and rupture in the production, perception, and symbolic meanings of adras.

Visual materials and public-facing analyses from the Central Asia Analytical Network¹⁰ and institutional publications have also been examined to contextualize symbolic meanings, usage patterns, and the role of textiles in modern Uzbek fashion and cultural discourse.

This integrative approach allows the study to trace the layered meanings of adras and other resist-dyed fabrics across historical and contemporary contexts, contributing to broader understandings of intangible heritage in Central Asia.

Historical background

The history of Central Asia is shaped by centuries of cultural exchanges, trade, and artistic innovation, largely influenced by its geographical position along the Silk Road. This network of trade routes connected the region with India, Iran, and Europe,. Among these, resist-dyeing techniques, which later became central to Uzbek textile production, played a significant role in shaping the region’s material culture.

Origins and global parallels

The history of Central Asia is shaped by centuries of cultural exchanges, trade, and artistic innovation, largely influenced by its geographical position along the Silk Road, which facilitated not only commerce but also the spread of ideas, artistic techniques, and textile traditions. Among these influences, resist-dyeing techniques, central to Uzbek textile production, played a significant role in shaping the region’s material culture.

There is no definitive evidence that resist-dyeing techniques originated in a single part of the world before spreading elsewhere. Likewise, there is no confirmation that adras appeared in Central Asia with the arrival of Islam or was introduced via the Silk Road. Resist-dyeing techniques have been found across diverse regions, including West Africa, South and Southeast Asia, China, and Indonesia, as well as in pre-Columbian Latin America — Peru, Guatemala, Mexico, El Salvador, Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina. It is possible that ikat weaving developed independently in Central Asia with minimal influence from neighboring countries, in relative isolation,¹⁰ but archaeological evidence from the Taklamakan Desert still confirms Central Asia's early role in global textile trade.¹

While China and Japan produced textiles using resist-dyeing techniques as early as the 6th century, some of the earliest surviving silk samples are from Japan’s Horyu-ji Buddhist temple (552–644 AD), and cotton textiles from the Astana burial site in China’s Xinjiang province date to the same period, Central Asia followed a different trajectory. Along the Silk Road, artistic production was dominated by Sogdian samites, a twill-woven fabric featuring pictorial designs. These textiles were unrelated to resist-dyeing traditions, indicating that abrabandi emerged in Central Asia later, reaching its peak significance in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Crafts and urbanization in late imperial Central Asia

The interplay between nomadic and urban lifestyles in Central Asia contributed to the development of rich craft traditions. While nomadic groups relied on portable textile arts, settled communities, particularly in the Fergana Valley, cultivated intricate weaving and dyeing techniques. By the 19th and early 20th centuries, silk textiles, particularly ikat (adras), became symbols of cultural identity and economic prosperity. The ruling elite, however, often favored brocade fabrics, reflecting social hierarchies through the use of luxurious materials.

During this period, cities within present-day Uzbekistan, particularly in the Kokand Khanate and the Emirate of Bukhara, were granted urban status based on the presence of at least 32 types of crafts. As a result, by the time of the first Russian Imperial Census in 1897, most urban dwellers identified as artisans or were engaged in craft production.⁵ Craftsmanship, including textile weaving, became the primary driver of urbanization and a crucial segment of the economy.

By the late 19th century, the majority of silk production in Central Asia was concentrated in the Ferghana Valley. In 1896, the region had more than 600 weaving workshops, primarily in Margilan, Namangan, and Kokand, whereas in the Tashkent region, there were only about 20. By 1910, the number of workshops in the valley had grown to 1,387, employing approximately 3,065 workers. All production was manual, and finished textiles were distributed throughout Central Asia.

The soviet era: industrialization and cultural shifts

Mechanization and cultural repression

If we examine the significance of adras through a decolonial lens, we cannot overlook the Soviet period (1920s–1991), which brought both developmental impulses and challenges to traditional crafts. Said⁸ notes that artists can serve as instruments of propaganda both during historical events and in their aftermath; contextual shifts can transform artistic works into ideological tools. Even the craft of abrabandi was not immune to this process.

A new visual narrative emerged in early Soviet Uzbekistan: adras patterns began to incorporate Soviet ideological symbols, such as the hammer and sickle, the Moscow Kremlin, satellites, and the inscription "USSR".¹⁰ The Soviet period marked a turning point for textile production in Uzbekistan. One of the most significant Soviet influences on traditional textile crafts was the widespread mechanization of weaving.⁵

Soviet industrialization marginalized traditional crafts and how artisans navigated the imposition of Soviet visual culture.³ While the USSR promoted industrial development, traditional handcrafted weaving techniques were increasingly replaced by mechanized processes. Large-scale factories were established, integrating synthetic dyes and standardized designs, which gradually eroded many artisanal elements of adras production.

Survival and institutionalization

At the same time, Soviet ideology sought to reshape cultural identities, promoting a unified Soviet aesthetic over local traditions. While handwoven fabrics continued to exist, their role was redefined, traditional attire became associated with rural life, while urban populations were encouraged to adopt modern, industrially produced textiles. Nevertheless, adras never fully disappeared, and some workshops persisted despite restrictions, passing down knowledge through family-based craftsmanship. Already in the second half of the 20th century, the production of adras was institutionalized: the Yodgorlik factory, founded in 1972, remained state-owned until Uzbekistan's independence. Today, it is the largest adras factory, producing approximately six kilometers of fabric per month. However, it is not the only surviving textile enterprise in the Ferghana Valley.

Today, the revival of adras is partly an effort to reclaim lost cultural heritage, restoring traditional methods that were suppressed or modified under Soviet rule. This movement is not only about preserving historical authenticity but also about redefining Uzbek identity in a post-Soviet world.

Techniques of resist dyeing in Central Asia

Core principles of Ikat technique

Resist dyeing is a textile technique that involves blocking certain areas of fabric from absorbing dye, creating intricate patterns and vibrant contrasts. While this method has been practiced globally, Central Asia developed its distinct approach, particularly in the production of adras (ikat) fabrics with significant motifs and color symbolism maintained communal identities.⁹

In Uzbekistan and neighboring regions, the ikat technique (also known as abrabandi) became a defining feature of textile production. Unlike other resist-dyeing methods, where the resist is applied to finished fabric, ikat is unique in that the dyeing process occurs before weaving. Threads are tightly bound in specific sections to prevent dye penetration, resulting in blurred, flowing patterns when woven into fabric.

Regional distinctions in Central Asian practice

Historically, ikat production in the Fergana Valley involved multiple dye baths, natural pigments, and elaborate hand-weaving techniques. This made adras a highly valued textile, often associated with social status and cultural identity.

While wax and paste techniques (such as batik in Indonesia) and binding techniques (such as Japanese shibori or tie-dye) rely on surface application, the Central Asian ikat method integrates pattern-making directly into the fabric’s structure. This distinctive process results in a fluid, organic aesthetic that differs from the sharp, detailed motifs found in wax-based dyeing traditions.

During the 19th century, ikat production flourished in the Fergana Valley, as well as in the territory of modern Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, where it became a central economic and cultural commodity. These textiles were highly valued both locally and in Silk Road trade networks, with elaborate patterns and vibrant colors reflecting both nomadic and settled artistic traditions. Adras fabric was widely used in traditional garments and home décor, marking social status and regional identity.

Today, the revival of traditional adras weaving in Uzbekistan reflects both a commitment to heritage preservation and a modern reinterpretation of resist-dyed textiles in global fashion and design.

Contemporary revival and global influence

Nation-building and post-soviet identity

Post-1991 independence spurred cultural revival efforts. In post-Soviet Uzbekistan, adras became central to national identity construction and has undergone a revival, reflecting a renewed cultural pride and a reassertion of traditional craftsmanship in a globalized world. Contemporary designers integrate historical motifs into modern fashion, blending heritage with innovation. The demand for handwoven textiles has also sparked international interest, positioning Central Asian ikat within the global luxury market.

This resurgence highlights a key question: How can adras remain a living tradition rather than a relic? As artisans navigate modern fashion, sustainability, and cultural preservation, ikat continues to evolve, bridging traditions with contemporary identities.

For much of the 20th century, Central Asia lacked the opportunity to develop a distinct national identity in the way that many other nations did. Unlike European states, which shaped their modern national consciousness through industrialization and political self-determination, or former colonies that underwent decolonization movements in the mid-20th century,⁴ Central Asia remained under Soviet control, its cultural and political identity subsumed within the larger framework of the USSR and required cultural reconstruction from suppressed traditions.

Negotiating heritage and modernity in fashion

During the Soviet period, traditional crafts and cultural expressions were either suppressed, redefined, or co-opted into state narratives. The production of resist-dyed textiles like adras shifted from being a deeply embedded local tradition to an industrialized commodity, often stripped of its symbolic meaning. Handwoven fabrics were increasingly replaced by mechanized production, and traditional garments became associated with rural life and backwardness, as Soviet ideology promoted a modern, industrial identity over ethnic or regional distinctions. Today, while seen as rural, adras is re-entering fashion through hybrid styles.

With Uzbekistan’s independence in 1991, the country, along with its Central Asian neighbors, was confronted with the challenge of constructing a national identity largely from fragments of pre-Soviet cultural heritage. The revival of traditional crafts, including adras weaving, became a strategic cultural and political effort to assert a unique Uzbek identity, separate from the Soviet past. Textiles, long embedded with cultural meaning, emerge as symbols of heritage and national pride, representing a return to indigenous traditions after decades of ideological erasure.

However, this revival is straightforward. Western and Islamic fashion compete with traditional dress codes, complicating gender and class dynamics. Crane & Bovone⁷ argue that fashion production gains cultural significance beyond mere clothing when it acquires additional symbolic value. This value can be associated with class identity, ethnicity, ethical norms, and historical heritage. Uzbek scholars⁶ note that modern Uzbek women, influenced by social expectations, are gradually moving away from traditional attire in favor of either Western or religious clothing. Traditional garments, including adras dresses, are often associated with rural lifestyles. Additionally, a few contemporary fashion brands incorporate adras into modern, trend-conscious designs. While Western-style clothing is perceived as liberating and practical, religious attire, such as covered headscarves and full-length monochrome robes, is increasingly seen as a means of achieving social stability and marital prospects in certain communities. This tension highlights the complex negotiation between heritage, modernity, and evolving social norms in post-Soviet Uzbek society.

Artistic practice and identity politics

Beyond everyday clothing, resist-dyed textiles are also playing a role in contemporary artistic expressions of identity. Many Central Asian artists use ikat to explore postcolonial identity and global belonging and engage with questions of representation, and post-colonial identity, using traditional crafts as a medium to explore what it means to be Uzbek or Central Asian in a post-Soviet world. The recognition of ikat weaving on UNESCO's Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity in 2017 further underscores the importance of this craft as a cultural marker, both locally and globally, and affirms ikat’s status as a living heritage.

Ultimately, the rediscovery of Central Asian identity is still in progress. The region is actively redefining its cultural heritage, balancing the revival of pre-Soviet traditions with contemporary influences. Adras, as both a historical artifact and a living craft, embodies this ongoing negotiation, a dialogue between past and present, tradition and modernity, memory and reinvention.

Globalization and the commercialization of cultural heritage

From local use to global market

As globalization accelerates, traditional crafts once deeply rooted in local identity are increasingly shaped by market forces rather than cultural significance. The growing international recognition of Central Asian textiles, including adras, has led to both opportunities and challenges. While global demand provides artisans with new economic prospects, it also raises concerns about the dilution of cultural meaning in favor of commercial appeal.

In the 21st century, adras has shifted from a functional everyday textile in Central Asia to a high-end commodity in Western markets. This transformation has made adras more visible globally but has also disconnected it from its original cultural context. Adras is now a luxury commodity in global fashion, often appropriated via industrial replicas. Luxury brands and mass-market retailers now produce printed imitations of ikat patterns, stripping the fabric of its handcrafted nature and historical depth. The 2020 Armani collection, which featured printed adras-inspired motifs, exemplifies this phenomenon, sparking discussions on the thin line between appreciation and appropriation. The commercialization process often disconnects adras from its cultural roots,³ and this erodes symbolic meaning and undermines local economies.

Fashion, appropriation, and power

Such commercial adaptations are not new. In the 19th century, the Russian Kuznetsov ceramics industry replicated adras motifs on ceramic plates and bowls for the Turkestan market, despite having no connection to traditional Central Asian craftsmanship.¹⁰ These examples illustrate a broader pattern in which cultural heritage is repackaged for external consumption, often at the expense of local artisans and traditional methods.

The rise of fast fashion and mass production further exacerbates this issue. Industrialized replicas of adras allow global brands to capitalize on the aesthetic appeal of traditional textiles without engaging with the communities that produce them. This not only reduces the economic benefits for local weavers but also contributes to the erosion of the deeper cultural and historical meanings embedded in the craft.

To counteract this, efforts to preserve the authenticity of adras must go beyond aesthetics. Supporting local artisans, promoting ethical production, and fostering an appreciation for the craft's history and techniques are crucial in ensuring that national heritage is not merely a marketable trend but a living tradition that retains its cultural depth and significance.

Policy responses and cultural preservation

One proposed strategy to promote and preserve traditional clothing, including adras, is to regulate the wearing of Western and Islamic fashion in specific contexts.⁶ Elements of this approach are already in place: in some schools, there are recommendations (though not outright bans) against wearing overly revealing clothing or head coverings, while the use of adras is encouraged. Government institutions have also introduced National Costume Days, where bright adras fabrics are permitted, while other vibrant garments may be considered inappropriate within professional dress codes.

Clothing as a form of material culture serves not only as a medium for validating personal values but also as a powerful tool for reinforcing collective identity.⁷ Measures such as National Costume Days and school guidelines promote traditional dress. However, policies must balance promotion with inclusivity and cultural flexibility. At the same time, this can lead to the symbolic overloading of garments, particularly those crafted through intangible heritage practices. Traditional textiles can become so burdened with meaning that they feel restrictive, rather than celebratory, for those expected to wear them. Today, ethnic clothing worn by ethnic Uzbeks can sometimes be perceived as outdated or lacking sophistication. This paradox creates both a marketing challenge and an advantage for artisans, while some struggle to sell their work, others capitalize on its exotic appeal.^11,12

This article has explored the historical and contemporary significance of resist-dyed textiles, focusing on adras as a crucial medium through which cultural identity in Central Asia has been constructed, contested, and revitalized. Drawing on a combination of historical analysis and comparative perspectives, it has shown how adras evolved from a regional artisanal practice shaped by Silk Road exchanges into a powerful symbol of national heritage, particularly in post-Soviet Uzbekistan.

By situating the story of adras within broader global discussions of intangible heritage preservation and commercialization, the study highlights the tensions that arise when traditional crafts enter global markets. As the examples discussed here suggest, while globalization has provided new opportunities for visibility and economic development, it also carries the risk of detaching these crafts from their original meanings and social contexts.^1,3,4

The revival of adras, therefore, is not simply a return to the past but a negotiation with modernity, shaped by new forms of cultural production, fashion, and international recognition. This paper contributes to the growing body of scholarship that treats textiles not merely as decorative objects, but as active agents in processes of nation-building, identity formation, and cultural resilience.

Preserving the vitality of adras requires more than safeguarding techniques; it demands continuous engagement with the communities, histories, and values that give the fabric meaning. As Central Asia continues to navigate the pressures of modernization and globalization, ensuring that traditions like adras weaving remain living, adaptable practices rather than frozen symbols will be crucial for sustaining cultural diversity and pride in the region.

I want to express my gratitude to the local textile artisans in Uzbekistan whose work and knowledge continue to inspire this research.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

None.

1. Sheng A. Textiles of the Silk Road: Cultural exchanges and identity formation. 2010.
2. Kurbanova G. Textile traditions among the Karakalpaks. 2024.
3. Dick H. Cultural heritage and the construction of identity in Central Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2018.
4. Edwards E. Material culture and postcolonial change: clothing and identity in Central Asia. 2005.
5. Khayitboeva NO. The history of the development of the national craft (textile and sewing) in the Ferghana Valley (end of the XIX century - beginning of the XX century). Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (GIIRJ). 2022;10.
6. Yodgorova KI. The role of adras fabrics in modern fashion. Science and Education. 2021;2.
7. Crane D, Bovone L. Approaches to material culture: The sociology of fashion and clothing. Poetics. 2006;34(6):319–333.
8. Said E. Orientalism. Modern critical thought. Garage Museum of Contemporary Art. 2021.
9. Kurniawan H, Salim A, Suhartanto H, et al. E-cultural heritage and natural history framework: An integrated approach to digital preservation. 2011.
10. Gyul E. The history and secrets of “cloud fabric” – abr silk. Central Asia Analytical Network. 2019.
11. Horam M. Social Institutions and Textile Heritage among the Tangkhul. 2021.
12. Meller S, Joost B, Gopalan G. Embroidery and identity: Suzani Textiles of Uzbekistan. 2013.