Research Article Volume 9 Issue 3
1Department of Dentitry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey
2Department of Medicine, Bezmialem Vak?f University, Turkey
Correspondence: Makbule Tugba Tuncdemir, Necmettin Erbakan University, Dentistry Faculty, Karacigan Neighborhood, Ankara Street, 74/A Karatay/Konya, Turkey, Tel 903000000000
Received: April 12, 2018 | Published: June 8, 2018
Citation: Tuncdemir MT, Tigli HK, Uysal O. Comparison of the existence of bruxism in different class students at the faculty of dentistry. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018;9(3):186-188. DOI: 10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00375
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of bruxism among the students attending Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Dentistry according to class by using a questionnaire and possible causes of this distribution.
Material and Method: A total of 396 students aged between 18 and 26 were included to the study. Before the study, the individuals were informed about the survey and they were allowed to fill the questtionnaires in private. SPSS 17 software and chi-square test was used for statistical analyses.
Results: Bruxism rate was found as 66.5%. Among the classes, the rates were 73.6%, 66.3%, 61.3%, 59.7% and 72.5% in first, second, third, fourth and fifth grades respectively. In females the bruxism rate was 75.2% and 51.7% in males. It was found that there was no significant difference among the classes (P>0,05) in bruxism rates and distribution of both sexes (P>0,05). Bruxism was higher in females than males, except for the first grade.
Conclusion: The bruxism rate that was higher in first grade was decreasing towards fourth grade but it was starting to increase again in fifth grade. Besides, the bruxism rate was higher in females than males, except for the first class. These results suggest that bruxism is closely related with stress.
Keywords: bruxism, dentistry, tress
Bruxism is defined as a repetitive jawbone movement, characterized by the compression or grinding of teeth by pressing and/or moving the mandible. It is classified as a "parafunction" because it is not a functional target such as chewing, phonation or swallowing.1 It has a high prevalence in society, 32.4% in children, and 54.51% in adults.2,3 There are two daily cycles of strangulation, sleeping and awake.4 Bruxism, which is experienced in a state of alertness, is more likely to manifest itself as a reaction to stress and anxiety and manifested by the tightness of the jaw muscles.5 In sleep bruxism, both teeth clenching and tooth creaking are observed.6 When dealing with diagnosis, both types can be grouped as "possible" (according to one's own expression), "likely" (self-expression and clinical examination), and "definitive" (according to self-expression, clinical examination and polysomnographic records).4−7 According to the commonly accepted idea, the etiology of bruxism is multifactorial.8 Overloading of muscles due to tooth tightening in bruxism disrupts local blood flow and ischemia leading to pain.9 Although there is no definite relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders in the literature, studies show that there is a high positive correlation.7−10 Various techniques have been used to detect sleep bruxism. In this respect, the most advanced applications are polysomnography and electromyography. However, the high cost of operation and the difficulty of accessing this equipment limit their use and lead to more convenient methods such as surveys.3 The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of bruxism among the students of the dental faculty and to have knowledge about the distribution according to the classes.
A total of 396 students aged between 18 and 26 who attended the Faculty of Dentistry Studying at Necmettin Erbakan University participated. The only condition for participants to be included in the study was that they continued to study in various classes at the Faculty of Dentistry. Before the study, the individuals were informed about the research and were asked to complete the questionnaire form on their own (Table 1). Students who participated in the study were asked to fill in the questionnaire form about the bruxism appropriately (n=396). In the questionnaire form, it was accepted that there were habit of tightening teeth at the subjects who answered yes to at least two questions about bruxism etiology.11 Because our aim was to rate bruxism awareness according to the classes in the dental school, statistical analysis was done according to the classes. SPSS 17 program and chikare test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance level was accepted as p <0.05.
Name: |
Surname: |
|
Age: |
Class: |
Gender |
Are you aware of occasional or frequent creaking or tightening of your teeth while you sleep (Yes / No) |
||
Has anyone ever told you that you creaked your teeth in your sleep? (Yes / No) |
||
Do you feel pain or fatigue when you wake up?(Yes / No) |
||
Did you feel fatigue or tension in your facial muscles when you wake up?(Yes / No) |
||
Do you find your teeth tight when you wake up (Yes / No) |
||
Have you ever woken up when your wake is locked and you cannot? (Yes No) |
||
Do you wake up with a headache, backache or pain behind your tongue? (Yes No) |
||
Do you think your teeth are worn out (Yes / No) |
||
Do you feel your teeth are swinging when you wake up? (Yes No) |
||
Do you have tenderness or pain in your teeth and gums when you wake up? (Yes No) |
||
Do you have pain in your temples when you wake up? (Yes No) |
||
Do you have difficulty in opening the mouth when you wake up? (Yes No) |
||
Does your teeth have sensitivity to the cold? (Yes / No) |
||
Are you aware that during the day you have no teeth or gnashing your teeth? (Yes No) |
Table 1 Questinare form
According to statistical analysis results, the ratio of bruxism among dental students was 66.5%. When the ratios according to the classes were examined, bruxism was found in 73.6% for the first class, 66.3% for the second class, 61.3% for the third class, 59.7% for the fourth class and 72.5% for the fifth class. Distribution of bruxism is seen according to class on Table 2. Bruxism was found to be 75.2% in females and 51.7% in males. Table 3 shows distribution according to the class and genders. There was no significant difference in terms of bruxism according to the classes (p=0,229) and there was no significant difference in terms of gender distribution according to the classes (p=0,141). Each class has its own sex; there is no difference in grade 1, but in other classes the rate of bruxism in women is significantly higher than in men.
Classes |
Bruxism |
|
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
23 |
64 |
2 |
28 |
55 |
33,7% |
66,3% |
|
3 |
31 |
49 |
38,8% |
61,3% |
|
4 |
31 |
46 |
40,3% |
59,7% |
|
5 |
19 |
50 |
27,5% |
72,5% |
Table 2 Distribution of bruxism according to classes
0: No bruxism 1:Bruxism
Classes |
Bruxism |
|
||
0 |
1 |
|||
1 |
gender |
M |
13 |
23 |
36,1% |
63,9% |
|||
F |
10 |
41 |
||
19,6% |
80,4% |
|||
2 |
gender |
M |
16 |
18 |
47,1% |
52,9% |
|||
F |
12 |
37 |
||
24,5% |
75,5% |
|||
3 |
gender |
M |
19 |
15 |
55,9% |
44,1% |
|||
F |
12 |
34 |
||
26,1% |
73,9% |
|||
4 |
gender |
M |
15 |
12 |
55,6% |
44,4% |
|||
F |
16 |
34 |
||
32,0% |
68,0% |
|||
5 |
gender |
M |
9 |
8 |
52,9% |
47,1% |
|||
F |
10 |
42 |
||
19,2% |
80,8% |
Table 3 Distribution of bruxism by class and gender
M:Male F:Female
In our study, the distribution of bruxism in classes and sexes diagnosed after the survey was examined. As a result, the bruxism rate, which was high in the first grade, was found to show a decreasing rate as the fourth grade but it was found to increase again in the fifth grade. Except for the first year students, women had higher bruxism than men. All these results suggest that bruxism is closely related to stress. It is difficult to diagnose bruxism because it does not give objective data.
None.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
©2018 Tuncdemir, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.