Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-4345

Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 5

A survey-based study on misplaced or damaged removable retainers

Pratik Premjani

Specialist Orthodontist, European University College (previously Nicolas & Asp University College), UAE

Correspondence: Pratik Premjani, Specialist Orthodontist, European University College (previously Nicolas & Asp University College), Dubai Healthcare City, Ibn Sina Building, No 27, Block D, 3rd Floor, Office 302, PO Box 53382, Dubai, UAE, Tel 971 4 362 4788, Fax 971 4 362 4793

Received: June 24, 2017 | Published: July 25, 2017

Citation: Premjani P. A survey-based study on misplaced or damaged removable retainers. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2017;7(5):361-363. DOI: 10.15406/jdhodt.2017.07.00259

Download PDF

Abstract

Retention is one of the most important challenges faced by the orthodontist. Patient’s need to be reminded that retention phase is a continuation of orthodontic treatment and preserving treatment results successfully will depend on their compliance towards wearing and maintaining appropriate appliances.1 The Retention plan among clinicians can vary from removable or fixed appliances, but the most common regime has been an upper removable appliance and a lower fixed appliance.2 The removable retainers are often prescribed for full time wear for the first 6 months. Patients often return to the dental office requesting new retainers due to damage or because they lost them. We did a study to identify the most common ways removable retainers are lost or damaged and how patients can be educated during delivery of removable retainers to avoid these causes.3

Materials and Methods

A study was designed to include the next 200 consecutive patients who walked in the Department of Orthodontics at European University College requesting new retainers. Only patients who damaged or misplaced their retainers were included and were asked to fill a questionnaire (Figures 1–3).

Figure 1 Survey Form given to patients who lost or damaged their retainers.

Figure 2

Figure 3

Results

Gender

Male- 143

Female – 67

Type of removable retainers lost/damaged

169 upper and 3 lower clear vacuum type retainers compared to 24 upper and 4 lower Hawley type retainers upper.

  1. Upper vacuum type clear retainer- 169
  2. Lower vacuum type clear retainer- 3
  3. Upper Hawley type clear retainer- 24
  4. Lower Hawley type clear retainer- 4

Time in retention phase (Table 1)

Time Since Debonding

No. of Patients

Less than 1 week

58

More than 1 week to 1 month

24

Between 1 month and 3 months

19

Between 3 months and 6 months

8

Between 6 months and 1 year

15

Between 1 year and 2 years

43

More than 2 years

33

Table 1 Time in retention phase

Damaged or Misplaced

29 retainers were damaged, while 171 retainers were lost. All 29 of the damaged retainers were clear vacuum type retainers (essix).

Discussion

In our study we found that more ‘clear vacuum formed type retainer’ were lost when compared to Hawley retainers, this could be due to the fact that these clear retainers often times cannot be spotted by others, making it more prone to losing it. A majority of the patients (133 out of 200) had not kept their retainers in the box provided during eating out, and lost them due as they were cleaned away or left behind wrapped on a tissue. Patients have to be reminded during the delivery of retainers to be extra careful while removing their retainers in eating areas and to place it carefully in the box provided. 19 retainers were lost as patients left their retainers in class / school. While a few orthodontist recommend not wearing the retainers to school, some still follow the full-time wear policy 6 months post debonding. Another finding of our study was the amount of retainers damaged by pets (mostly dogs) chewing on them. There is no scientific reason as to why the pets chewed on them but it could be due to the saliva in the retainers that attracts the pets and makes them chew on it thereby damaging it. Patients should be asked to keep their retainers away from the reach of their pets as it was the second most common reason for replacing retainers. Males tend to lose more retainers compared to females, the reasoning behind this could be the fact that girls tend to carry handbags and it is easier for them to carry the retainer box with them in their handbags. Patients need to understand the importance of wearing these retainers and replacing them on time in case any incident happens. Failure to do so can result in relapse as 16 of the patients in the study did not replace their removable retainers on time and returned with signs of relapse. While sometimes minor relapses can be managed with active retainers, some instances can also require retreatment (Table 2).

Lost - Reason

No. of Patients

In a restaurant/ food court

113

While swimming

7

Left it in class/school

19

Others

32

Damaged - Reason

By pets

21

During travel

6

Others

2

Table 2 Reason for lost/damage

Conclusion

We have based our conclusions on important tips and reminders that orthodontists need to inform patients on avoiding possible damage or losing their removable retainers:

  1. Wear your removable retainers for the prescribed amount of time as instructed by your orthodontist. To prevent movement of teeth, it is very important that you wear it precisely as discussed.
  2. You are not allowed to eat anything with your removable retainer in your mouth. When you remove your retainer for eating, remember to put them in the case provided and someplace safe. Do not put them in your lunch bag or wrap them in a napkin, as this is the most common way retainers are lost.
  3. Keep your retainers away from your pets as this is the second most common way retainers are lost.
  4. During travelling, always place them in a case and then in the suitcase, as this could also lead to potential damage.
  5. Always remove your retainers for swimming or any contact sport.
  6. Lastly, contact your orthodontist immediately if you misplace your retainers or if they are damaged.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

Creative Commons Attribution License

©2017 Premjani. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.