Submit manuscript...
Journal of
eISSN: 2373-6437

Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 3

A tribute to Professor J. Antonio Aldrete-Salceda 1937-2025

Víctor M. Whizar-Lugo,1,2 Francisco Romo-Salas2

1Chief Editor Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open Access, Mexico
2Former President of the Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Anestesiología, Mexico

Correspondence: Victor M. Whizar-Lugo MD, Anesthesiologist at Lotus Med-Group, Tijuana, México

Received: May 25, 2025 | Published: June 23, 2025

Citation: Whizar-Lugo VM, Romo-Salas F. A tribute to Professor J. Antonio Aldrete-Salceda 1937-2025. J Anesth Crit Care Open Acces. 2025;17(2):82-84. DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2025.17.00624

Download PDF

Editorial

World Anesthesiology has lost a great professor of international reputation; J. Antonio Aldrete-Salceda MD has died on January 12th, 2025. Without a doubt, his greatest legacy for our profession is the score to assess post-anesthetic recovery that all anesthesiologists around the world use every day.1,2 Toño, as he was known among his Latin American friends, was born in Mexico City in 1937 and graduated in 1960 from the School of Medicine at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. After completing two years of surgical training, he entered the anesthesiology residency at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, under the guidance of Robert Hingson MD, and then he moved on to the Administration Veterans Hospital in Denver, Colorado, where he was the anesthesia director and pioneer in anesthesia for liver transplants. Professor Aldrete also served as Chief of Anesthesia at Cook County Hospital in Chicago and as Professor of Anesthesia at Tampa, Florida. The University of Alabama at Birmingham founded the Aldrete award for Excellence in Pain Medicine, which is given to distinguished anesthesiologists at the annual banquet offered to the new residents. He founded the Arachnoiditis Foundation in Birmingham, AL.

While working in the Administration Veterans Hospital, he saw the need for a scale to assess patients post anesthetic recovery. This score was validated and sent to the editor of the journal Anesthesiology, who rejected it arguing that it has no clinical usefulness. A revised version of his original manuscript was sent to the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia, where it was published in 1970.1 That same year, Dr. Aldrete presented his score at the International Anesthesia Research Society congress and the official commentator was Dr. Hingson himself, who accurately predicted a practical future for this clinical measurement, which was also recommended by the Joint Commission of Accreditation of Hospitals in 1980, and revised by its author in 1995.2

It is important to mention that before the publication of Aldrete score in the journal Analgesia and Anesthesia, Aldrete and Kroulik published their idea in Spanish in the Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología.3 In this original publication, the authors propose their score making a similarity to the Apgar score for newborns, and mention that it can be used in all types of patients, regardless of sex, age and type of anesthesia. Unlike the score that would be used later, in this first report the fifth parameter referred to the color of the patient (skin and mucous membranes) as indirect oxygenation data, a measurement that would later be replaced by oximetry.

 Variable

 Assessment Interpretation

 Score

 Activity

 Able to move all extremities voluntarily or on command

 Able to move two extremities voluntarily or on command

 Unable to move extremities voluntarily or on command

 2

 1

 0

 Respiration

 Able to breathe deeply and cough freely

 Dyspnea or limited breathing

 Apneic or on the mechanical ventilator

 2

 1

 0

 Circulation

 Blood pressure +/- 20% or less of the preanesthetic level

 Blood pressure +/- 20% to 49% of the preanesthetic level

 Blood pressure +/- 50% or more of the preanesthetic level

 2

 1

 0

 Consciousness

 Fully awake

 Arousable on calling

 Not responding

 2

 1

 0

Color

Pink

Pale, dusky, blotchy, jaundiced, other

Cyanotic

 2

 1

 0

Table 1 The Aldrete scoring system1

The objective assessment of physiological and physical vital parameters after anesthesia-surgery is a fundamental part of the safe recovery of each patient before being discharged from the post anesthesia recovery unit (PACU) to their hospital bed or home. The first Aldrete score had five crucial parameters: activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and changes in color of mucous membranes and skin. Each parameter is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 2, with a maximum score of 10 (Table 1). Almost 25 years later, in a letter to the editor of the Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Aldrete made substantial modifications to his score following several ideas from various researchers4-8 who suggested replacing the color of the skin and mucous membranes with the measurement of oxygen saturation. In this new score, in addition to replacing the patient's color index with oximetry, he included 5 new signs: the appearance of surgical dressings, postoperative pain, ambulation, fasting-feeding, and urine output (Table 2).

 Variable

 Assessment Interpretation

 Score

 Activity

 Able to move all extremities voluntarily or on command

 Able to move two extremities voluntarily or on command

 Unable to move extremities voluntarily or on command

 2

 1

 0

 Respiration

 Able to breathe deeply and cough freely

 Dyspnea or limited breathing

 Apneic or on a mechanical ventilator

 2

 1

 0

 Circulation

 Blood pressure +/- 20% or less of the preanesthetic level

 Blood pressure +/- 20% to 49% of the preanesthetic level

 Blood pressure +/- 50% or more of the preanesthetic level

 2

 1

 0

 Consciousness

 Fully awake

 Arousable on calling

 Not responding

 2

 1

 0

 Oxygenation

 Able to maintain O2 saturation >92% on room air

 Needs supplemental O2 to maintain O2 saturation >90%

 O2 saturation <90% even with supplemental oxygen

 2

 1

 0

 Dressing

 Dry and clean

 Wet but marked and not increasing

 A growing area of wetness

 2

 1

 0

 Pain

 No pain

 Mild pain handled by oral medication

 Severe pain requiring parenteral medication

 2

 1

 0

 Ambulation

 Able to stand up and walk straight

 Vertigo when erect

 Dizziness when supine

 2

 1

 0

 Fast-feeding

 Able to drink fluids

 Nauseated

 Nausea and vomiting

 2

 1

 0

 Urine output

 Has voided

 Unable to void but comfortable

 Unable to void and uncomfortable

 2

 1

 0

Table 2 The modified Aldrete scoring system for ambulatory surgeries

Since the first Aldrete's score was published, countless studies have been published assessing this scale with this same goal to evaluate post-anesthesia discharge from the PACU to the hospital bed or home in the case of outpatient surgery. Currently, there are several scales to measure recovery from anesthesia;9-13 all of these measurements have their own merit and usefulness, although the most widely used scale due to its simplicity and effectiveness continues to be the Aldrete score, both in patients who remain hospitalized and in those who are discharged on the same day of their surgery.

A born professor-researcher, he published hundreds of articles and several books in English and Spanish on topics as varied as malignant hyperthermia, low flows and closed systems of anesthesia, psychological aspects and anesthesia, costs and theories on anesthesia, and pain. In addition to supporting young doctors for their entry into anesthesiology residency and having been a professor at hundreds of congresses and medical meetings around the world, Professor Aldrete enjoyed participating in humanitarian campaigns. In 1985, he was one of the leaders of the medical group that supported the Mexican Red Cross during the earthquake that shook Mexico City, a story that was repeated in the earthquake in 1986 in the Republic of El Salvador. This type of actions showed his altruism and generosity by helping hundreds of affected individuals who needed medical attention in disaster areas.

During his retirement he gave us part of his personal library, which is now an historical piece of the library of the Colegio de Anestesiología de León, in México. He made us think about our future as anesthesiologists, as lecturers, as professors and most of all, as human beings. One of his frequent pieces of advice was that we should always seek to update our knowledge with the goal that proper information and experience are the best resources in the daily practice of anesthesiology, in the responsible care of each patient. We also learned that anesthesiology has countless resources to solve each particular case, as long as you have the resources, knowledge, and honesty to know when to change techniques for the benefit of our patients.14

Thank you Toño for being a great human being, for the trust and the wise advice that you give us when we started in anesthesiology. You will continue to be our guide in these professional endeavors, and you will surely continue to be the example of numerous anesthesiologists around the world for many years to come.

Professor J. Antonio Aldrete-Salceda was a world-renowned anesthesiologist, expert in algology, tireless author of a large volume of articles and books, mentor, researcher, clinician, and inventor. Rest in Peace

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:924–934.
  2. Aldrete JA. The post–anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:89–91.
  3. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. Un método para evaluar la condición física en el período postanestésico. Rev Mex Anest. 1969;18:17–19.
  4. Soliman IE, Patel RI, Ehrenpreis MB, et al. Recovery scores do not correlate with postoperative hypoxemia in children. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(1):53–56.
  5. Chung F. Are discharge criteria changing? J Clin Anesth. 1993;5(6 Suppl 1):64S–68S.
  6. Chung F. Discharge criteria––a new trend. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(11):1056–1058.
  7. Kamal GD, Hassell SM, Pyle RS, et al. Measuring arterial hemoglobin saturation (SaO2). Anesth Analg. 1992;74(Suppl):156.
  8. Naimark TM. A comparison study of the post anesthesia recovery score and pulse oximetry. J Post Anesth Nurs. 1990;5(3):168–176.
  9. Deshmukh PP, Chakole V. Post–anesthesia recovery: A comprehensive review of Sampe, modified Aldrete, and White scoring systems. 2024;16(10):e70935.
  10. Wessels E, Perrie H, Scribante J, et al. Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting: A narrative review. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78:110685.
  11. Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR–40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):161–169.
  12. Ead H. From Aldrete to PADSS: Reviewing discharge criteria after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2006;21(4):259–267.
  13. White PF, Song D. New criteria for fast–tracking after outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with the modified Aldrete's scoring system. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(5):1069–1072.
  14. Whizar–Lugo V. El profesor y amigo; Don Antonio Aldrete–Salceda. Anest Mex. 2008;20:110–111.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2025 Whizar-Lugo, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.