Submit manuscript...
International Journal of
eISSN: 2576-4454

Hydrology

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 1

Evincing the social and economic impact of inland waterways transportation in the development of the Port Harcourt metropolis

Ogboeli Goodluck Prince,1 Brown Ibama,2 Onuegbu Williams3

1Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
2Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
3Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Correspondence: Brown Ibama, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Co-correspondence: Ogboeli Goodluck Prince, Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Received: January 15, 2024 | Published: February 16, 2024

Citation: Ogboeli GP, Brown I, Nwankwoala HO, et al. Evincing the social and economic impact of inland waterways transportation in the development of the Port Harcourt metropolis. Int J Hydro. 2024;8(1):27-35. DOI: 10.15406/ijh.2024.08.00370

Download PDF

Abstract

Road traffic congestion has been decreased by using water transportation. The impact of inland waterways transportation on the socio-economic growth of Port Harcourt Metropolis was investigated in this essay. The study adopted a quantitative research approach using a cross-sectional survey design and employed a multi-stage sampling technique. The first stage involves identifying the locations of the jetties and navigable routes available in the metropolis. The second stage involves the listing of the jetties and navigable routes found within the study area which nine (9) jetties and navigable routes were identified. The third stage involves purposively selecting six (6) jetties out of the nine (9) jetties listed. The selected jetties and navigable routes include (Bonny/Bille/Nembe, Marine Base, Abonnema Wharf, Maccoba, Iwofe, and Akpos). The six (6) jetties were selected because of their frequent usage by commuters. The fourth stage involves randomly selecting 200 commuters who are using these jetties and navigable routes for sampling. Using a random sample technique, a structured questionnaire was designed and distributed to the commuters to acquire data for the study. Descriptive statistics (tables and charts) and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data set. Other sources of data for the study include direct observation and photographs to characterise the study area and inland waterways transportation development in the metropolis. The reason the study chose to focus on the commuters and boat operators is because the commuters and operators are individuals who commonly use inland waterways transportation systems. The study found that lack of funds, poor river basin dredging and canalisation, insufficient security and infrastructure, a lack of safety devices, and inadequate training of boat operators and drivers are among the issues and obstacles. Therefore, the study recommends that the government should support efforts to enhance boat service operations for sustainable modes of transportation to promote their use by more people and ease traffic on the roads.

Keywords: boat, jetties, passengers, inland water transportation, socio-economic impact

Introduction

Transportation entails the movement of goods, people, and animals from one location to another. It is also the process of making the physical movement of objects easier for people from one location to another. Humans cannot function without movement because is a fundamental activity that must be carried out. Based on this necessity, and the pursuit of social and economic development through science and technology, human movement and transportation facilities are among the most significant human endeavours globally. Transport through inland waterways is the movement of goods and services along a river network.1,2 Inland waterways transport is an additional mode of transportation in Nigeria. However, in Rivers State, most riverine communities are accessible through navigable waterways as it predominates other modes of transport.3 Inland waterways transport is one of the most unobtrusive and environmentally friendly options for conveying goods and services because of the significant roles it played during the Industrial Revolution and the early spread of civilisation.4

Although the inland waterways transportation system is relatively underdeveloped and recent to Nigerians, there is an extensive network of streams, creeks, rivers, and coastal lagoons in Nigeria that offer enormous potential for the creation of an operative inland waterways transportation system in Nigeria and Rivers State in particular. The need for an inland waterways transport system engenders humans to enjoy the same commercial benefits as the ports which were more fortunate to be located at the seashores leading to the development of effective inland waterways transportation. This is because it has the unique advantage of being able to convey both commodities and humans to interior locations far from the seashore. At the same time, it is more economical because it can haul massive loads to longer distances.5 Creeks, lakes, and rivers are naturally navigable inland waterways, in addition to the seaside, which uses ferries, boats, and other water-related vehicles to cater for mobility.

As originally envisioned by the British colonial masters, the initial motivation for the development of the colonial regime in Nigeria was to open up the interior hinterlands for resource exploitation and ease of access for administrative purposes hence, the development of inland waterways. It was to operate than other modes of transportation such as railways and roads. It is such that the rivers were intended to be a core component of the multimodal transport system in addition to road, train, and air operating from one tributary to another. After 59 years since their conception, the federal government's efforts to develop the nation's inland waterways transportation through the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) with the dredging of the lower River Niger have been crippled by corruption and poor management.6 The opportunities such as revenue generation and employment creation inherent in harnessing the potentials of the inland waterways transportation industry in Nigeria are lost daily, and experts have over the years expressed concerns about it.

Sea travellers globally enjoy having good times on sea and have come to believe that river travelling is both exciting and enjoyable. Others view travelling by boat as an alternative means to convey goods and services from one locality to another, across states, and international borders as a remarkable experience. Nigeria with a thriving population supported by abundant and diverse natural resources has immeasurable and startling growth potential that is enough to provoke jealousy globally from other landlocked countries and countries with limited sources of inland waterways. Nigeria also possesses a long coastline that is supported by a thriving hinterland; and when these factors are applied to shipping, it simply means that with thoughtful planning, methodical growth, and political resolve, there are opportunities to achieve maritime power.

The social and economic development of some of the most difficult-to-access rural areas and the welfare of residents who fall among the lowest-income groups in the social ladder are greatly aided by the inland waterways transport system. Most of the outermost villages would be out-of-the-way or too expensive to service by other methods of transportation in the absence of rivers and other inland waterways transport systems. The opening up of many inland rivers encourages the distribution of goods and services and further serves as a feeder to larger ports. In addition to the use of jetties for shipping services, haulage, storage, and low-cost security, no country has adequate travellers to the extent of establishing itself as the only inland waterways hub in the area. Furthermore, the conditions to be met in the provision of an alternate port in the event of an emergency or security issues have a significant impact on shipping enterprises. The government of Rivers State needs a healthy and responsive inland waterways transportation infrastructure to maintain and improve economic viability, business growth, and productivity.7 To maximally utilise the emerging technology-driven transportation system, there must be a deliberate policy of a nation to make critical investments that will engender its inland waterways transportation system to be the fulcrum of progress and prosperity. Inland waterways transportation systems are critical to contemporary civilisation since they have enormous economic advantages and minimal negative environmental consequences such as topographic changes, minimal usage of energy and resources, land pre-emption, less noise and air pollution.

As a fundamental economic activity, the inland waterways transportation system represents an efficient alternative for moving freight to engender the survival and continuous growth of the economy. There are a few requirements that must be met to establish an inland waterways transport system in Nigeria because the country has gateways with an excellent network of hinterland connections. These requirements are based on the knowledge that no one would consider treating such a crucially important sector as a good means of transport without the greatest care and consideration. Shipping, short sea, inland waterways, and coastal traffic are all sub-sections that deserve significant attention and research efforts. Inland waterways transportation is indispensable to the expansion and development of all other economic sectors including urban development and growth. Since it is essential to international trade, it also has significant contributions towards bringing various regions of the world closer together. Inland waterways transportation is essential for connecting the foreland to the hinterland and helps to fill in the gap left by land inadequacies of other modes of transportation in keeping up with emerging trends. The purpose of this study therefore is to evince the social and economic impacts of the inland waterways transportation system in the Port Harcourt Metropolis.

Study area

The Port Harcourt Metropolitan area in Rivers State, Nigeria, and a few chosen jetties and loading ports were the subject of this study. The decision of Port Harcourt was influenced by commuter movement and the accessibility of water transportation. It has a complicated nature of commuting within the metropolis characterised by significant traffic congestion and extended travel times. Port Harcourt Metropolis and its environs are located within Latitudes 4°05’30’’N and 5°14’25’’N and Longitudes 5°40’30’’E and 7°11’01’’E of the Greenwich Meridian (GM). Obio/Akpor and Port Harcourt City are the two most important local governments within the metropolis. The region is situated inside the sedimentary coastline formation of the Niger Delta. Due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean, the coastal city's atmosphere is influenced by the equatorial monsoon climate. The rainfall and temperature patterns in the city are influenced by both the maritime and continental air masses Figure 1–3.8

Figure 1 Map of Rivers State showing rivers and creeks and local government boundaries.
Source: Authors Analysis, 2024.

Figure 2 Map of Rivers State showing different communities and its rivers and tributaries.
Source: Authors Analysis, 2024.

Figure 3 Map of Rivers State showing jetties in the study areas.
Source: Authors Analysis, 2024.

Methodology

The study adopted a quantitative research approach using a cross-sectional survey design. The study employed a multi-stage sampling technique. The first stage involves identifying the locations of the jetties and navigable routes available in the metropolis. The second stage involves the listing of the jetties and navigable routes found within the study area which nine (9) jetties and navigable routes were identified. The third stage involves purposively selecting six (6) jetties and navigable routes (Bonny/Bille/Nembe, Marine Base, Abonnema Wharf, Maccoba, Iwofe, and Akpos) from the 9 jetties and navigable routes that were identified because of their frequent usage by commuters. The fourth stage involves randomly selecting 200 commuters who are using these jetties and navigable routes for sampling (Table 1). Using a random sample technique, a structured questionnaire was designed and distributed to the commuters in order to acquire data for the study. Descriptive statistics (tables and charts) and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data set. Other sources of data for the study include direct observation and photographs to characterise the study area and inland waterways transportation development in the metropolis. The reason the study chose to focus on this group is because the commuters and operators are individuals who commonly use inland waterways transportation systems.9–11

Jetty

Sampling Frame

Sample Size (5%)

Bonny/Bille/Nembe

1407

70

Marine Base

501

25

Abonnema Wharf

768

38

Maccoba

557

28

Iwofe

263

13

Akpos

524

26

Total

4020

200

Table 1 Details of questionnaire distribution
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Results

The socioeconomic characteristics of the passengers, the quantity of the jetties, and their perceptions of how often they use the ferry were examined. It started with the social and economic characteristics as the focus of the first segment. This was closely followed by the quantity of jetties and the opinions of the passengers on the frequency of using ferries as a mode of transportation were the main topics of the second section.

Gender distribution of passengers

From the available field data, it was found that (54.5%) of the passengers in the research area were men, as indicated in Table 2. The percentage of male passengers at Iwofe Jetty was the largest (66.7%) while that at Akpos was the lowest (44.0%). The proportion of female passengers using the inland boat shuttle was lower than the percentage of male passengers. Of all passengers, women make up 45.5% of the total. The Akpos jetty had the highest percentage of females (56.0%), while the Iwofe jetty had the lowest percentage (33.3%). This implied that males were more likely than females to utilise the water transport system to complete their daily tasks.

Jetty

Gender

Total

 

Male

(%)

Female

(%)

 

Bonny

37

52.9

33

47.1

70

Okrika

12

48

13

52

25

Bakana

23

60.5

15

39.5

38

Isaka

17

60.7

11

39.3

28

Iwofe

6

66.7

4

33.3

12

Akpos

11

44

14

56

25

Total

108

54.5

90

45.5

198

Table 2 Gender distribution inland waterways transportation passengers
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Marital status of passengers

Married couples are the top users of boat services across the six jetties in the study area, according to Table 3, which indicates marital status. Singles are the next most frequent users of boat services across all six jetties. This implied that fewer single people use the waterways, while much fewer widows, widowers, and separated people use the boat services to travel to their various places. Additionally, evidence demonstrates that married commuters are more likely to use boat services than singles and widows/widowers to employ the boat service to reach their destinations for financial reasons. Additionally, it is believed that employing boat service will save the married commuters money and time and allow them to reach their various destinations faster and further minimise the hours they would have been stuck in traffic using the roads.

Jetty

Marital Status

Total (%)

 

Single

Married

Widow/widower

Separated

 

Bonny

22

41

1

6

70

Okrika

9

11

2

3

25

Bakana

11

21

4

2

38

Isaka

11

14

1

2

28

Iwofe

4

7

0

1

12

Akpos

6

17

1

1

25

Total

63

111

9

15

198

Table 3 Marital status of passengers of passengers who use inland waterways transportation
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Age distribution of passengers

Data from Table 4 indicates that commuters in the age cohort of 28 years to 37 years who used boats at all the jetties in the study area were more likely to utilise them to travel to various locations on the Island. A total of 55.7% of the respondents said they commuted by boat at Bonny, Bakana (55.3%), Okrika (52%) Iwofe (50%) Akpos (40%) and Isaka (39.3%) jetties. Whereas 22.2% of the respondents fall within the age cohorts of 38 years to 47 years commuted by boat to all six jetties in the study area.

Furthermore, the data from Table 4 indicates that in Isaka Jetty, 32.1% of the respondents were within 38 years – 47 years age cohort. This age cohort is like users in Iwofe (25%), Akpos (24%), Bakana (18.4%), Okrika (16%), and Bonny (7.6%). This analysis reveals that younger people within 28 years –37 years age cohorts in Bonny, which constitutes the modal age cohort (55.7%), used boat services to travel to Bonny and other diverse destinations in this study, while customers from Isaka in the 38 years – 41years age cohorts among the jetties ply the inland waterways in Port Harcourt metropolis to various locations on the Island in Rivers State at a lower rate (32.1%). Since Port Harcourt is the commercial hub of the metropolitan region, the analysis shows a correlation between the age cohorts of 38 years – 47 years and 38 years – 41 years suggesting that more middle-aged commuters were more likely to access boat services. Therefore, starting daily commuting to get to their various destinations such as places of business, and other economic endeavours would attract more patronage to the inland waterways transport service.

 

Age distribution

Total

Jetty

<18 years

(%¨)

18-27 years

(%)

28-37 years

(%)

38-47 years

(%)

>47

(%)

Bonny

3

4.2

7

10

39

55.7

15

7.6

6

8.6

70

Okrika

2

8

3

12

13

52

4

16

3

12

25

Bakana

1

2.6

5

13.2

21

55.3

7

18.4

4

10.5

38

Isaka

1

3.6

4

14.3

11

39.3

9

32.1

3

10.7

28

Iwofe

0

0

1

8.3

6

50

3

25

2

16.7

12

Akpos

0

0

5

20

10

40

6

24

4

16

25

Total

7

3.5

25

12.6

100

50.5

44

22.2

22

11.1

198

Table 4 Age distribution of passengers who use inland waterways transportation
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Educational status of passengers

Available data in Table 5 indicates that commuters who have first degrees or their equivalent HND/BSc represent 62.1% of the respondents across the jetties in the study area and are more likely to use inland waterways for transportation. This group of commuters is closely followed by commuters with secondary school diplomas. Since the different destinations are located within the major business centres of the Port Harcourt Metropolitan area, it implies that HND holders were more likely to continue using the boat services to get to their places of employment. Additional information in Table 5 indicates that 19.7% of the respondents with secondary school diplomas used boat services to get to their various destinations in all the jetties. Another possibility is that working-class commuters favour the use of boat services because they think it gets them to their destinations faster, conveniently, and reliably.

   

Educational Status

Total

Jetty

No Formal

Primary

Secondary

HND/BSc

Post-Graduate

Bonny

0

4.3%

14.30%

65.7%

15.7%

70

Okrika

0

0

20%

68%

12%

25

Bakana

2.60%

5.3%

28.90%

50%

13.2%

38

Isaka

0

3.6%

17.90%

75%

3.6%

28

Iwofe

0

8.3%

8.30%

58.3%

25%

12

Akpos

0

0

28%

52%

20%

25

Total

0.50%

3.50%

19.70%

62.1%

14.1%

198

Table 5 Educational status of passengers who use inland waterways transportation
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Occupational distribution of boat passengers

Data from Table 6 indicates that 23.2% of the respondents in all six jetties who utilise boat services are traders. Overall, 31.8% of respondents in all six jetties of the study region used boats for their various private businesses. Students 11.1% of respondents in all the jetties of the study region use the boat service, followed by civil servants 22.2%, made up the remaining respondents in all the jetties. The main takeaway from this is that commuters who work for private businesses tend to use the boat services more frequently. This implies that the various locations included in the study are within the Port Harcourt Metropolitan commercial zone.

 

Occupation distribution

Total

Jetty

FM

(%)

TD

(%)

PB

(%)

CS

(%)

ST

(%)

OT

(%)

Bonny

2

2.9

19

27.1

21

10.6

17

24.3

7

10

4

5.7

70

Okrika

0

0

4

16

9

36

11

44

1

4

0

0

25

Bakana

4

10.5

8

21.1

11

28.9

6

15.8

5

13.2

4

10.5

38

Isaka

1

3.6

7

25

9

32.1

3

10.7

6

21.4

2

7.1

28

Iwofe

0

0

3

25

6

50

2

16.7

0

0

1

8.3

12

Akpos

4

16

5

20

7

28

5

20

3

12

1

4

25

Total

11

5.6

46

23.2

63

31.8

44

22.2

22

11.1

12

6

198

Table 6 Occupation distribution of passengers who use inland waterways transportation
Label: FM - Farming; TD - Trading; PB - Private business; CS - Civil Service; ST - Student; OT - Others.
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Income distribution of passengers

Commuters using the boat services within the study area are significantly impacted by their monthly income. The data from Table 7 indicates that those boat users whose income falls between N51,001 and N70,001, represent a cumulative of 35.4% of the total respondents from the various study jetties. Also, respondents whose monthly income falls between N71,001 and N90,000 were close behind representing 23.2% of all respondents across all six jetties in the study area. In evaluating the boat service in Port Harcourt's inland waterways route, respondents who made between N30,000 and N50,000 (18.7%) in all study locations were also highly significant.

 

Income Distribution (Naira)

Total (%)

Jetty

<N30, 000

N30, 000-N50,000

N51,000-N70,000

N71,000-N90,000

>N91, 000

Bonny

4.30%

24.30%

27.10%

14.30%

30%

70

Okrika

4%

8%

44%

28%

16%

25

Bakana

5.30%

15.80%

34.20%

26.30%

18.40%

38

Isaka

0

25%

32.10%

35.70%

7.10%

28

Iwofe

0

16.70%

58.30%

25%

0

12

Akpos

16.00%

12%

44%

24%

4.00%

25

Total

5.10%

18.70%

35.40%

23.20%

17.70%

198

Table 7 Income distribution of passengers who use who use inland waterways transportation
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Characteristics of Inland Waterways Transport System in the Port Harcourt Metropolitan Region

The opinions of respondents on inland waterways transportation are displayed in Table 8. The study discovered that when the criterion mean was 2.5 or higher, the following factors were all above the criterion mean of -/+2.50: Jetties facilities age (3.2), Poor security network/architecture (3.5), Political Influence (3.4), Underutilisation of inland waterways (3.3), Poor maintenance of facilities (2.6), as well as Facilities easily accessible (2.5), indicating a high negative impact on the characteristics of inland waterways transportation in Port Harcourt Metropolis. The following considerations, however, were all disregarded: Water safety devices/buoyance aids (2.3), Professional skilled employment (2.1), Adequate facilities (1.7), and Sufficient jetties (1.6). The overall mean of 2.6 indicates that the Port Harcourt inland waterways system has poor features.

ITEM

SA

A

D

SD

Total

SWV

Mean

Remark

Rank

x-x̄

(x-x̄)2

4

3

2

1

Adequate facilities

28

57

158

93

198

336

1.7

Rejected

9th

-0.9

0.81

Sufficient Jetties

16

6

210

87

198

319

1.6

Rejected

10th

-1

1

Jetties Facilities aged

284

336

14

8

198

642

3.2

Accepted

4th

0.6

0.36

Facilities Easily Accessible

168

180

102

45

198

495

2.5

Accepted

6th

-0.1

0.01

Waterway under Utilised

332

309

8

8

198

657

3.3

Accepted

3rd

0.7

0.49

Professional Skilled Employed

48

141

182

48

198

419

2.1

Rejected

8th

-0.5

0.25

Facilities poorly Maintained

216

129

124

39

198

508

2.6

Accepted

5th

0

0

Water safety gadgets/buoyance aids

136

123

156

45

198

460

2.3

Rejected

7th

-0.3

0.09

Political Influence

420

237

12

8

198

677

3.4

Accepted

2nd

0.8

0.64

Poor security network

444

228

10

6

198

688

3.5

Accepted

1st

0.9

0.81

Total

           

26.2

     

4.46

Average mean

 

         

2.6

       

Table 8 Characteristics of inland waterways transport according to the passengers who use inland waterways transportation
Key: SA – Strongly Agree; A -Agree; D -Disagree; SD -Strongly Disagree; SWD - Sum of Weighted Value.
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Evincing the significant social and economic impact of inland waterways transportation on the Port Harcourt Metropolitan Area

Available data in Table 9 indicates a breakdown of the various variables that may have influenced the social and economic impacts of inland waterway transportation in the Port Harcourt Metropolitan area. These variables engender the conclusion that respondents believe that the creation of jobs, businesses, and other strands of income had the greatest impact on the study area, with a mean score of 3.5, followed closely by the creation of jobs within the community by fuel stations located close to jetties and terminals which was represented with a mean score of 3.0. However, inland waterways transportation has an average mean on the social and economic impact of 3.3. Other impacts of inland waterway transportation have mean values above the median job creation, business/income generation, import and export, raises in the living standards, boost food security and tourism in communities along navigable rivers, boat builders are essential in the reduction of the cost of transportation, Jetties also serve as meeting places for other businesses, inland water transit generates employment for cargo handlers, and fuel stations located near those jetties and ports further generate employment locally. With an aggregate grand mean of 3.3, all the parameters were more than the criteria mean of -/+2.50.

Item

SA

A

D

SD

Total

SWV

Mean

Remark

Rank

x-x̄

(x-x̄)2

4

3

2

1

Creation of Job, Business/income

416

273

4

1

198

694

3.5

Accepted

1st

0.2

0.04

Promote tourism

368

267

24

6

198

665

3.4

Accepted

4th

0.1

0.01

Import & Export

420

237

12

8

198

677

3.4

Accepted

2nd

0.1

0.01

Food security

316

276

32

11

198

635

3.2

Accepted

5th

-0.1

0.01

Improves standards of living

388

267

12

6

198

673

3.4

Accepted

3rd

0.1

0.01

Boat builders are necessary in riverine communities

332

213

76

6

198

627

3.2

Accepted

6th

-0.1

0.01

Jetties serve as meeting points for other businesses

284

252

70

8

198

614

3.1

Accepted

8th

-0.2

0.04

Inland water transport creates jobs for cargo handlers

288

234

78

9

198

609

3.1

Accepted

9th

-0.2

0.04

Fuel stations situated close to jetties/terminals create jobs in the community

276

225

80

14

198

595

3

Accepted

10th

-0.3

0.09

Reduction in transportation cost

324

216

80

5

198

625

3.2

Accepted

7th

-0.1

0.01

Total

           

32.5

     

0.27

             

3.3

       

Table 9 Social and economic impact of inland waterways transportation on Port Harcourt Metropolis
Key: Key: SA – Strongly Agree; A -Agree; D -Disagree; SD -Strongly Disagree SWD - Sum of Weighted Value.
Source: Field Survey (2024).

Challenges of Inland Water Transportation System in Port Harcourt Metropolis

Table 10 reveals that the respondents' impression of the difficulties with the inland water transportation system in the study area has a mean of 3.4 and a standard deviation of 2.1. The average mean, however, is 2.9. These challenges range in difficulty by 1.3. In the area, effects with a mean above the median are regarded as being extremely severe. Lack of funding from the government or NGO involvement, poor river dredging, inadequate security, inadequate infrastructure, a lack of safety devices and proper training for boat drivers and operators, poor quality of vessels/unsafe vessels, overloading, and an insufficient number of water vessels are among the impacts with high severity, with corresponding mean values of 3.4, 3.4, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.6, and 2.6, respectively. Effects that met the threshold of 2.5, however, were acknowledged and rated accordingly, while those that did not were disregarded.

ITEM

SA

A

D

SD

Total

SWV

Mean

Remark

Rank

x-x̄

(x-x̄)2

4

3

2

1

Overloading

224

144

116

36

198

520

2.6

Accepted

7th

-0.3

0.09

Lack of funding from the Government/NGO Involvement

420

237

12

8

198

677

3.4

Accepted

1st

0.5

0.25

Inadequate infrastructural facilities

284

336

14

8

198

642

3.2

Accepted

4th

0.3

0.09

Poor dredging of the river

388

267

12

6

198

673

3.4

Accepted

2nd

0.5

0.25

Insufficient Number of Water Vessels

216

129

124

39

198

508

2.6

Accepted

8th

-0.3

0.09

Poor Quality of Vessels/Unsafe Vessels

276

225

80

14

198

595

3

Accepted

6th

0.1

0.01

Inadequate Security

368

267

24

6

198

665

3.4

Accepted

3rd

0.5

0.25

High Cost of Transport

48

141

182

48

198

419

2.1

Rejected

10th

-0.8

0.64

Lack of safety gadgets and proper training of boat operators and drivers alike.

316

276

32

11

198

635

3.2

Accepted

5th

0.3

0.09

Floating logs and debris in the river especially the navigable waters.

136

123

156

45

198

460

2.3

Rejected

9th

-0.6

0.36

Total

           

29.2

     

2.12

             

2.9

       

Table 10 Challenges of Inland water transportation system in Rivers State
Key: SA – Strongly Agree; A -Agree; D -Disagree; SD -Strongly Disagree SWD - Sum of Weighted Value.
Source: Field Survey, 2024.

Measures to address the challenges of inland waterway transportation in Port Harcourt Metropolis

The result of the study reveals the opinion of most respondents regarding the solutions to the challenges of inland waterways transportation in the study area. The maximum mean of 3.5 is represented by respondents whose perceptions tilt towards the provision of transportation infrastructure facilities in the research area. The lowest mean of 3.1 is represented by respondents who thought about proper maintenance of existing facilities. The mean is 3.3 on average. The range of severity for solutions to inland-water transportation issues is, however, 0.4. In the area, effects with a mean above the median are regarded as being extremely severe. With an aggregate grand mean of 3.3, all the parameters did, however, exceed the criterion mean of -/+2.50 Table 11.

ITEM

SA

A

D

SD

Total

SWV

Mean

Remark

Rank

x-x̄

(x-x̄)2

4

3

2

1

Provision of Transportation Infrastructural Facilities

428

264

4

1

198

697

3.5

Accepted

1st

0.2

0.04

Route safety and monitoring gadget

436

252

6

2

198

696

3.5

Accepted

2nd

0.2

0.04

Adapt Professional skills/retraining

408

255

14

6

198

683

3.4

Accepted

5th

0.1

0.01

Adequate Funding by Government

416

273

4

1

198

694

3.5

Accepted

3rd

0.2

0.04

Public Enlightenment

384

240

26

9

198

659

3.3

Accepted

6th

0

0

Strengthening the security architecture

356

225

40

14

198

635

3.2

Accepted

8th

-0.1

0.01

Dredging and canalization of shallow waters

436

237

14

3

198

690

3.5

Accepted

4th

0.2

0.04

Implementation of Cabotage Law

356

219

70

1

198

646

3.3

Accepted

7th

0

0

Private Sector Involvement

340

207

62

9

198

618

3.1

Accepted

9th

-0.2

0.04

Proper Maintenance

324

201

80

10

198

615

3.1

Accepted

10th

-0.2

0.04

Total

           

33.4

     

0.26

             

3.3

       

Table 11 Measures to address the challenges of Inland Waterways Transportation in the Port Harcourt Metropolitan Area
Key: SA – Strongly Agree; A -Agree; D -Disagree; SD -Strongly Disagree; SWD - Sum of Weighted Value.
Source: Field Survey, 2024.

Discussion of findings

The data presented in Table 2 indicates significant gender variations in passenger distribution across different jetties in the research area. Iwofe Jetty stands out with the highest percentage of male passengers (66.7%), while Akpos has the lowest (44.0%). Conversely, Akpos Jetty has the highest percentage of female passengers (56.0%), and Iwofe Jetty has the lowest (33.3%). The overall pattern suggests a notable gender imbalance in water transportation usage for daily tasks, with many passengers being men. This could be influenced by various factors such as job locations, commuting patterns, or cultural aspects that may lead males to be more inclined towards utilizing water transport. It's important to consider the socio-economic and cultural context of the research area to better understand the reasons behind these gender-based disparities in water transportation preferences. Further investigation to identify factors influencing these patterns would provide valuable insights into the dynamics of daily mobility in the region.3

The information from Table 3 suggests a clear trend in boat service usage among different marital statuses. Married couples emerge as the primary users, likely driven by both convenience and financial considerations. The data implies that singles, widows, widowers, and separated individuals are less inclined to utilize boat services, possibly due to factors such as alternative transportation preferences or less reliance on waterways. The financial aspect seems pivotal, with married commuters being more likely to choose boat services for economic reasons. This could be attributed to the perception that using boats is a cost-effective and time-saving alternative to conventional commuting, especially considering the potential reduction in time spent in traffic.3 However, the specifics of why married couples find boat services financially advantageous are not entirely clear from the provided information. It might be related to reduced commuting time, lower overall transportation costs, or other factors not explicitly mentioned in the text. Further analysis of additional data could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics at play.

The provided information suggests a correlation between age cohorts and the utilisation of boat services at different jetties in the research region. Commuters within the 28 years to 37 years age cohorts especially in Bonny, show a higher likelihood (55.7%) of using boats to travel within the study area. Meanwhile, respondents age cohorts of 38 years to 47 years, particularly at the Isaka Jetty exhibit a lower rate (32.1%) of using boats. The analysis hints at a potential link between age and commuting preferences, with the younger population favouring boat services, possibly for convenience or other reasons. Moreover, the connection between the 38 years - 47 years age cohorts and increased boat usage suggests that middle-aged individuals are more inclined to access these services, likely for daily activities such as commuting to offices or places of business in the commercial hub of Port Harcourt. This correlation between age brackets and boat utilisation could have implications for transportation planning and service promotion, emphasising the importance of understanding demographic preferences to tailor services effectively.3

The data indicates a correlation between education level and the likelihood of using inland waterways for transportation in the study area. HND and BSc holders, comprising 62.1% of respondents, are more inclined to utilize boat services, possibly due to the central business locations in metropolitan Rivers State. This implies a connection between higher education and commuting patterns. Furthermore, the proximity of secondary school diploma holders in boat service usage, particularly in major business centres, hints at varied preferences among education groups. The data from Table 5, indicates that 19.7% of respondents with secondary school diplomas using boat services, adds nuance to this trend. The speculation about HND holders continuing to use boat services for employment transportation aligns with the idea that working-class commuters might prioritise the speed, convenience, and reliability offered by boat services. This suggests a multifaceted relationship between education, occupation, and transportation choices in the research area.3

The data from Table 6 indicates the income distribution among passengers of which 23.2% of respondents who use boat services across all six jetties are traders, while 31.8% use boats for private businesses. Notably, students (11.1%) and civil servants (22.2%) constitute the remaining users. The key observation is that those employed in private businesses are the primary boat service users, suggesting a concentration of such businesses in the study region. This implies a commercial hub within Metropolitan Port Harcourt, with most workers in the central business district engaged in private enterprises. The income distribution among passengers significantly influences boat service utilization in the Port Harcourt inland waterways. Notably, those earning between N51,001 and N70,001 form the largest user group, comprising 35.4% of total respondents. The income bracket of N71,001 to N90,000 closely follows, accounting for 23.2%. Interestingly, respondents earning between N30,000 and N50,000, constituting 18.7%, also play a notable role in evaluating boat services. Table 6 highlights those traders and those with incomes exceeding N90,000 (17.7%) are prominent users, while those earning less than N30,000 (5.1%) show lower utilization. This income-based analysis sheds light on the diverse user dynamics impacting boat services in the region.

The findings from Table 8 suggest that several factors related to inland waterways transportation in the Port Harcourt Metropolitan Area have a significant negative impact. Notably, issues such as the age of jetty facilities, poor security network/architecture, political influence, underutilization of inland waterways, and poor maintenance of facilities were identified as having a considerable negative effect, as reflected by their criterion mean scores above 2.5. Conversely, certain considerations, including water safety devices/buoyance aids, professional skilled employment, adequate facilities, and sufficient jetties, were disregarded due to criterion mean scores below 2.5. This implies that respondents did not perceive these factors as having a substantial impact on inland waterways transportation in the region. The overall mean of 2.6 indicates a generally poor assessment of the features of Rivers State's inland waterways. It suggests that the combination of factors assessed, on average, contributes negatively to the effectiveness and efficiency of inland water transportation in the state.3 Further analysis and targeted interventions may be necessary to address the identified challenges and improve the overall state of inland waterways in Rivers State.

The data presented in Table 9 evinces the significant social and economic impact of inland waterways transportation on the Port Harcourt Metropolitan Area. This assertion represents the highest mean score of 3.5 which indicates a strong belief in the creation of jobs, businesses, and income as the most influential factor. It is followed closely by the creation of jobs in the community such as fuel stations near jetties and terminals, with a mean score of 3.0.

Outstandingly, the overall average mean score for the social and economic impact of inland waterway transportation is 3.3, surpassing the median. Succinctly put, the mean values above the median include job creation, business/income generation, import and export facilitation, improvement in living standards, enhanced food security, and promotion of tourism in riverside communities. Boat builders play a vital role, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various sectors. Notably, the aggregate grand mean of 3.3 for all parameters surpasses the criteria mean of +/-2.50, indicating a collective positive perception of the socio-economic effects of inland waterway transportation. This suggests a consensus among respondents that the benefits, such as reduced transportation costs, employment generation, and local business opportunities, outweigh potential drawbacks.3 In conclusion, the study underscores the multifaceted positive impact of inland waterways transportation in Rivers State, highlighting its role in fostering economic growth, community development, and employment opportunities.

Table 10 presents data on respondents' impressions of challenges with the inland water transportation system. The Mean of 3.4 and a standard deviation of 2.1 indicate a varied response among participants. The overall average mean of 2.9 suggests a moderately challenging perception. Challenges with mean values above the median (considered extremely severe) include lack of government or NGO funding, poor river dredging, inadequate security, and insufficient infrastructure, all scoring 3.4. Additionally, issues like a lack of safety devices and proper training (mean 3.0), poor quality or unsafe vessels (mean 2.6), and overloading (mean 2.6) are noted with high severity. The 1.3 range in difficulty highlights the diversity in respondents' views. Effects meeting the 2.5 thresholds were acknowledged and rated, while those below were disregarded, emphasizing a selective approach to assessing challenges. In summary, the findings reveal a nuanced perspective on inland waterways transportation difficulties, with certain issues standing out as notably severe according to respondents' mean ratings.

The study indicates a diverse range of opinions among respondents regarding solutions to inland-water transportation issues in the study area. While transportation infrastructure facilities received the highest mean of 3.5, proper maintenance had the lowest mean of 3.1, resulting in an average mean of 3.3. The narrow range of severity, only 0.4, suggests relatively consistent views among respondents. It's noteworthy that the mean of 3.3 exceeds the criterion mean of -/+2.50, indicating a generally positive perception of the proposed solutions. However, the study emphasises that even though the aggregate grand mean is 3.3, there is variation among specific parameters. The categorisation of effects with a mean above the median as extremely severe provides a qualitative assessment, highlighting areas of particular concern. It would be valuable to explore the nuances behind these perceptions through qualitative methods or further analysis to gain a deeper understanding of respondents' perspectives. In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the perceived effectiveness of solutions to inland-water transportation issues, emphasising the importance of both infrastructure facilities and proper maintenance, while acknowledging the need for nuanced considerations within these broad categories.

Conclusion and recommendations

Inland waterway transportation's effects on Rivers State's socioeconomic growth were investigated in this study. It was discovered that the inland waterways were characterised by shoddy maintenance, outdated jetties, and political influence. As a result of the poor supply of jetties and other necessary infrastructure, the capacity of the water mode of transportation was significantly reduced. The importance of inland waterways transportation in the socioeconomic development of the Port Harcourt Metropolitan area, even with its subpar infrastructure, cannot be overstated. The area's increased mobility has been a significant contribution made by inland water transportation. Jetties served as meeting places for other businesses thereby creating jobs for cargo handlers, and fuel stations located close to jetties/terminals also created jobs for the communities within the study area. In addition, it reduced the cost of transportation, improved the standard of living, promoted tourism, increased food security, and brought smiles to the faces of boat builders.

Additionally, the frequency with which commuters who travel by water utilise it suggests that a larger percentage of the population may eventually choose to use it. However, several areas need attention, including a lack of funding, subpar dredging and canalisation of the river basin, insufficient security and infrastructure, a lack of safety devices and adequate training for both boat drivers and operators, poor quality and unsafe vessels, overloading and an insufficient number of water vessels, safety-related issues, and poor security near jetties are the main obstacles that may deter younger generations. To dramatically increase its capacity to fully complement the road transport mode, water transportation must receive more attention from the government and the commercial sector, even though it has immense promise in the area. A larger investment in the infrastructure of water transportation and the provision of contemporary vessels could aid this. Infrastructure for transportation must be provided, routes must be safe and monitored, there must be adequate funding from the government, shallow waters must be dug up and canalized, professional skill/retraining must be adopted, the public must be educated, the cabotage law must be put into effect, the security architecture must be strengthened, and there must be proper maintenance.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B. The Geography of Transport System (3rd ed). 2013.
  2. Oni SI. Nigeria's Transport Infrastructural Development: An Integral Part of the National Economic, Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS). Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos. 2009.
  3. Ogboeli GP, Iyama WA, Onuegbu W. Incidences and Trend of Marine Accident Fatalities in Various River Routes Connecting the Major Sea Ports of Nigeria. International journal of research and innovation in applied science. 2023.
  4.  Ikporuko K. The Development and Utilization of Nigeria’s Inland waterways system status and ideal. The Nigerian Geographical Journal New Series. 1994;1:187–202.
  5. Oliver Klein. Rising enhanced RIS and IT services supporting multimodal Transports involving inland waterways e-freight 2012 conference [9-10 May 2013] in Delft the Netherlands. 2012.
  6. Akintayo B. Transport Economics, Applied to all modes, policy issues and logistics management. ILAGUN, Printers, Zaria, Nigeria. 2010.
  7. Badejo Bamidele, Salaam TI.  Transportation and the Environment: The Lagos Example in Lagos state and the Environment. Lagos State Ministry of Environment. 2010.
  8. Chiadikobi KC, Omoboriowo AO, Chiaghanam OI, et al.  Flood risk assessment of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2011;2(6):287–298.
  9. Progoulaki M, Roe M. Dealing with Multicultural Human Resources in a Socially Responsible Manner: A Focus on the Maritime Industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2011;10:7–23.
  10. Tzannatos E. Human Element and Accident in Greek Shipping. The Journal of Navigation. 2010;63:119–127.
  11. Celik M, Cebi S. Analytical HFACS for Investigating Human Errors in Shipping Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2009;41(1):66–75.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2024 Ogboeli, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.