Research Article Volume 4 Issue 2
1Associate Professor, Department of SWCE, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, India
2Professor, Department of SWCE, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, India
Correspondence: Subudhi CR, Associate Professor (SWCE), CAET, OUAT, BBSR-3, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751003, India
Received: June 20, 2016 | Published: July 22, 2016
Citation: Subudhi CR, Senapati SC. Relationship between rainfall, runoff, soil loss and productivity in north eastern ghat zone of odisha. Biom Biostat Int J. 2016;4(2):84-89. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2016.04.00093
A trial was conducted at All India Coordinated Research Project ,OUAT, Phulbani during the year 2007-09 with the objectives to quantify the runoff and soil loss under different cropping systems and develop relationship among them. The treatments tried were T1-Sole crop of rice, T2- Sole crop of pigeon pea. T3-Sole crop of groundnut,T4-Pigeonpea and rice in alternate strips, T5- Pigeon pea and groundnut in alternate strips, T6-Intercrop of rice and pigeon pea (5:2), T7- Intercrop of groundnut and pigeon pea (4:2),T8-Uncultivated fallow,T9-Cultivated fallow, All crops were planted across the contour. Intercrop of groundnut and pigeon pea (4:2) gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield compared to other sole crops. Mean rice equivalent yield was 38.62q/ha. Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) introduction increased the yield by 158% as 97% and 21% when compared with sole crop of rice, pigeon pea and groundnut respectively. Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest runoff of 309mm which is 23% less than the cultivated fallow (401mm).Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest soil loss (8.03t/ha) which is 47% lower than the cultivated fallow (with highest soil loss 15.19 t/ha).The Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest (24.2%) mean runoff of the rainfall compared to other treatments. The relationship among rainfall, runoff and soil loss was found out which can be used to predict the runoff and soil loss from rainfall for same type of soil condition and slope. The Thus it can be concluded that intercropping of groundnut with pigeon pea planted along contour may be practiced to increase crop yield and lowering the soil loss and runoff in the hilly tribal areas of Kandhamal district of Odisha.
Keywords: relationship, rainfall, runoff, soil loss, productivity
Strip and intercropping of cereal crops with pulses/oilseeds are approved practices of breaking long slopes, which prevent soil loss, reduce runoff and enhance productivity. Therefore, this experiment has been designed to know the effect of strip as well as intercrop of pigeonpea, rice and groundnut on runoff, soil loss and productivity on sloppy agricultural land. These intangible benefits have not been assessed properly. Hence the present experiment has been designed. Samra JS1 reported that renovation of terrace and plantation of fruit plants, timber plants improved biomass production, net returns, growth of crop, productivity, reduction of runoff in the range of 1.5-10.8 times, peak flow rate by 20 times& soil loss in the range of 1.2 to 5.2 times ,as well as water table rise. Subudhi et al.2 have reported that effect of vegetative barrier like Vetiver has increased the rice yield, decrease the soil loss and decrease the runoff compared to farmers practice. Arora et al.3 reported that there is a growing need for rain water management since 96 m ha out of 142 m ha of net cultivated land of the country is rainfed. Scientific use of these resources will definitely increase the productivity &conservation of resources like soil & water. Kumar4 reported that impact of different soil& water conservation techniques viz. contour bunding, terracing, land leveling, smoothening& gully plugging, sowing across the slope, vegetative barrier, increase the Kharif crops by 25-30 percent. Establishment of vegetative barrier with mechanical measures were more effective in controlling soil erosion(3.8 t ha-1) over conventional method(9.64 t ha-1)and runoff thereby making more moisture available for crop growth. Anonymous5-7 reported that intercropping of groundnut with pigeonpea planted along contour gave the highest rice equivalent yield, lowest soil loss and runoff.
To quantify the runoff and soil loss under different cropping systems and develop relationship among them.
A trial was conducted at All India Coordinated Research Project, OUAT, Phulbani during the year 2007-09. The experiment was laid out on 2% land slope. Multi slot division box and drums were put to measure the runoff and soil loss daily after each rainfall. The treatments tried were T1-Sole crop of rice, T2- Sole crop of pigeon pea. T3-Sole crop of groundnut, T4-Pigeonpea and rice in alternate strips, T5- Pigeon pea and groundnut in alternate strips, T6-Intercrop of rice and pigeon pea (5:2), T7- Intercrop of groundnut and pigeon pea (4:2), T8-Uncultivated fallow, T9-Cultivated fallow, All crops were planted across the contour. Different crops and their varieties are, Rice- ZHU-11-26; Pigeon pea - UPAS-120; Groundnut- Smruti (OG-52-1). The experiment design was Randomized Block Design and numbers of replications were three. Plot size was 25mX2m. Seed rate were, Rice-75kg/ha; Pigeon pea-25kg/ha; Groundnut-150kg/ha (pod). Fertilizer applied was;
Basal: Rice-30:30:30kg N-P2O5-K2O/ha; Pigeon pea-20:40:20kg N-P2O5-K2O/haGroundnut-20: 40:40 kg N-P2O5-K2O/ha.
Top dressing: Rice- 30kg N in two splits.
The runoff collected daily at 8 AM was measured from the drum and 1 lit of runoff from each drum were collected for silt analysis, so soil loss can be measured from the silt sample collected after evaporating the sample in the heater. The rainfall was also measured. Thus the relation between rainfall (mm)-runoff (mm), rainfall (mm)-soil loss (t/ha) and runoff (mm)-soil loss (t/ha) were calculated and coefficient of determination was also calculated.
Rainfall, runoff and soil loss: During 2009 Pigeon pea received the highest amount of rainfall (1544.8mm) this cropping treatment received the highest amount of runoff (516mm) In addition, Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest runoff of 309mm which is 23 % less than the cultivated fallow (401mm).Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest soil loss (8.03t/ha) (Table 1) which is 47 % lower than the cultivated fallow (with highest soil loss 15.19 t/ha). The Groundnut + pigeon pea (4:2) gave the lowest (24.2 %) mean runoff of the rainfall compared to other treatments. The poor and marginal farmers having lands in upland ecosystem may go for this technology Figures 1-6.
Treatments |
Run Off (mm) |
|
|
Soil Loss(t/ha) |
|
Run Off (% of Rainfall) |
||||||
|
2007 |
8 |
9 |
Mean |
2007 |
8 |
9 |
Mean |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Mean |
T1 – Rc Sole |
221.268 |
295.3 |
514 |
344 |
6.72 |
10 |
12.6 |
9.78 |
21.7 |
25.3 |
33.3 |
26.8 |
T2- Pp Sole |
226.92 |
296.4 |
516 |
347 |
7.116 |
10 |
12.7 |
9.94 |
22.26 |
25.4 |
33.4 |
27 |
T3-Gn Sole |
221.943 |
284 |
508 |
338 |
6.49 |
9.4 |
12.4 |
9.42 |
21.77 |
24.3 |
32.9 |
26.3 |
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
221.1 |
279.5 |
487 |
329 |
6.47 |
9.6 |
11.8 |
9.3 |
21.68 |
23.9 |
31.5 |
25.7 |
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
220.003 |
275.9 |
482 |
326 |
6.708 |
9.5 |
11.8 |
9.31 |
21.58 |
23.6 |
31.2 |
25.5 |
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)intercropping |
217.725 |
270 |
471 |
320 |
6.358 |
9.3 |
9.81 |
8.5 |
21.35 |
23.1 |
30.5 |
25 |
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)intercropping |
213.376 |
258.4 |
456 |
309 |
6.231 |
8.6 |
9.25 |
8.03 |
20.96 |
22.1 |
29.5 |
24.2 |
T8- Uncultivated fallow |
234.175 |
347.7 |
555 |
379 |
7.395 |
12 |
17.8 |
12.39 |
22.97 |
29.8 |
35.9 |
29.6 |
T9- Cultivated fallow |
250.119 |
364.7 |
588 |
401 |
9.772 |
16 |
19.8 |
15.19 |
24.53 |
31.2 |
38.1 |
31.3 |
Mean |
225.214 |
296.9 |
509 |
344 |
7.029 |
10 |
13.1 |
10.21 |
22.09 |
25.4 |
32.9 |
26.8 |
Table 1 Runoff and soil loss under different cropping systems during 2007 to 2009 (3 years)
Moisture content: From Table 2 it is observed that the Gn+Pp (4:2) intercropping gave highest moisture content, plant height and other yield attributing characters compared to other treatments so moisture content might be the reason to increase the yield.
Treatments |
Mean |
Moisture |
|
Content |
|
T1 – Rc Sole |
15.5 |
T2- Pp Sole |
16.1 |
T3-Gn Sole |
16 |
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
16.2 |
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
17.6 |
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)intercropping |
17.1 |
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)intercropping |
17.8 |
T8- Uncultivated fallow |
15.6 |
T9- Cultivated fallow |
15.2 |
SE (m)+ |
0.251 |
CD(0.05) |
0.903 |
Mean |
16.3 |
Table 2 Mean moisture content and yield attributing characteristics during 2007-09
Nutrient loss: Nutrient loss in different treatments were shown in Table 3, it is observed that total nutrient loss was highest in treatment 9 i.e. Cultivated fallow may be due to the reason that soil surface was exposed without any crop and cultivated and also soil loss was more in this treatment compared to other treatments. Lowest nutrient loss was in T7 (42.21kg/ha) i.e. -Gn+ Pp (4:2) intercropping.
Treatments |
Nutrient loss from different Treatments, Kg/ha |
Total Nutrient Loss, kg/ha |
||
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
T1 – Rc Sole |
11.5 |
10.14 |
29.7 |
51.34 |
T2- Pp Sole |
11.5 |
13.24 |
35.62 |
60.36 |
T3-Gn Sole |
13.13 |
12 |
28.76 |
53.89 |
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
11.13 |
9.69 |
23.52 |
44.34 |
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
11.5 |
7.16 |
27.42 |
46.08 |
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)intercropping |
10.38 |
6.14 |
25.94 |
42.46 |
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)intercropping |
12.25 |
4.62 |
25.34 |
42.21 |
T8- Uncultivated fallow |
11.5 |
4.17 |
36.02 |
51.69 |
T9- Cultivated fallow |
16.25 |
2.82 |
45.43 |
64.5 |
Table 3 Nutrient lost from soil sample collected from runoff from different treatments
Yield attributing characteristics: The biometric characteristics of different crops under different treatments is given in Table 4 it is observed that the Gn+Pp (4:2) intercropping gave highest plant height and other yield attributing characters compared to other treatments.
Treatments |
Rice |
|
|
Pigeonpea |
|
Groundnut |
|
||
Plant height, cm |
Penicle length, cm |
No of tillers /m run |
Plant height, cm |
Spread, Cm |
No of branches |
Plant height, cm |
No of branches |
No of pods per plant |
|
T1 – Rc Sole |
71.4 |
17 |
51.5 |
||||||
T2- Pp Sole |
186.6 |
93 |
22.1 |
||||||
T3-Gn Sole |
65.4 |
8 |
35.2 |
||||||
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
74.6 |
17.4 |
53.8 |
191.6 |
99 |
22.2 |
|||
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
198 |
106 |
23.1 |
74.5 |
8.6 |
37.9 |
|||
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)inter cropping |
78.1 |
18.2 |
61.2 |
201.7 |
98 |
21.9 |
|||
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)inter cropping |
209.6 |
107 |
23.1 |
76 |
9 |
42.1 |
|||
Mean |
74.7 |
17.5 |
55.5 |
197.5 |
101 |
22.5 |
72 |
8.5 |
38.4 |
Table 4 Mean yield attributing characteristics during 2007-09
Yield: Intercrop of groundnut and pigeonpea (4:2) gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield compared to other sole crops. Mean rice equivalent yield was 38.62 q/ha. Groundnut + pigeonpea (4:2) introduction increased the yield by 158 % as 97% and 21% when compared with sole crop of rice, pigeonpea and groundnut respectively (Table 5).
Treatments |
REY(q/ha) |
|||
2007 |
8 |
9 |
Mean |
|
T1 – Rc Sole |
21.05 |
21.17 |
22.38 |
21.53 |
T2- Pp Sole |
33.39 |
25.44 |
25.85 |
28.23 |
T3-Gn Sole |
54.18 |
41.31 |
41.87 |
45.79 |
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
37.53 |
32.58 |
33.7 |
34.6 |
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
53.78 |
42.45 |
44.25 |
46.83 |
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)intercropping |
40.43 |
35.84 |
37.08 |
37.78 |
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)intercropping |
66 |
49.04 |
51.68 |
55.57 |
T8- Uncultivated fallow |
||||
T9- Cultivated fallow |
||||
SE (m)+ |
0.961 |
0.612 |
0.601 |
0.586 |
CD(0.05) |
2.914 |
1.885 |
1.823 |
1.778 |
Mean |
43.78 |
35.4 |
36.69 |
38.62 |
Table 5 Rice equivalent yield, under different cropping systems during 2007 to 2009 (3 years)
Economics: From Table 6 it is observed that the Gn+Pp (4:2) intercropping gave highest mean B:C ratio i.e. 2.06 compared to all other treatments among all the cropping system treatments.
Treatments |
Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha) |
Gross income (Rs/ha) |
Net income (Rs/ha) |
B:C ratio |
Rain water use efficiency (Kg/ha/mm) |
T1 – Rc Sole |
14000 |
17933 |
3,933 |
1.28 |
1.6 |
T2- Pp Sole |
14200 |
23391 |
9,191 |
1.65 |
1.7 |
T3-Gn Sole |
21721 |
39582 |
17,861 |
1.82 |
2.9 |
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
17861 |
28866 |
11,005 |
1.62 |
2.2 |
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
19294 |
38839 |
19,545 |
2.01 |
2.9 |
T6-Rc + Pp (5:2)intercropping |
19166 |
32222 |
13,056 |
1.68 |
2.4 |
T7-Gn+ Pp (4:2)intercropping |
22577 |
46411 |
23,834 |
2.06 |
3.4 |
Table 6 Economics and Rain water use efficiency during 2007-09 as affected by different in-situ conservation practices
The relationship between rainfall (mm), runoff (mm) and soil loss t/ha was presented in Table 7-9. The correlation coefficient was also found out. The relationship among rainfall, runoff and soil loss was found out which can be used to predict the runoff and soil loss from rainfall for same type of soil condition and slope.
Treatments |
Relations |
|
|
|
|
Rainfall(X) mm & Runoff(Y)mm (Co.det.) |
Rainfall(X)mm & soil loss(Z) t/ha (Co.det) |
Runoff(Y)mm & soil loss(Z)t/ha (Co.det) |
|||
T1 – Rc Sole |
Y=0.36-0.011X+0.004X2 (0.969) |
Z= 0.03-0.006X+0.0002X2 (0.96) |
Z= -0.101+0.043Y(0.976) |
||
T2- Pp Sole |
Y=0.49-0.015X+0.004X2 (0.966) |
Z=0.033-0.007X+0.0002X2 (0.957) |
Z= -0.102+0.044Y(0.983) |
||
T3-Gn Sole |
Y=0.426-0.004X+0.004X2 (0.968) |
Z=0.023-0.004X+0.0002X2 (0.965) |
Z= -0.079+0.039Y(0.988) |
||
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
Y= 0.427-0.005X+0.004X2 (0.968) |
Z= 0.023-0.004X+0.0002X2 (0.965) |
Z= -0.079+0.039Y(0.988) |
||
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
Y= 0.401-0.0003X+0.004X2 (0.969) |
Z= 0.032-0.006X+0.0002X2 (0.958) |
Z= -0.1+0.043Y(0.976) |
||
T6-Rc+Pp (5:2) intercropping |
Y= 0.383-0.002X+0.004X2 (0.969) |
Z= 0.021-0.004X+0.0002X2 (0.967) |
Z= -0.078+0.039Y(0.988) |
||
T7-Gn+Pp (4:2)intercropping |
Y= 0.346-0.008X+0.004X2 (0.970) |
Z= 0.02-0.004X+0.0002X2 (0.969) |
Z= -0.076+0.039Y(0.987) |
||
T8-Uncultivated fallow |
Y= 0.65-0.045X+0.005X2 (0.963) |
Z=0.04-0.008X+0.0003X2 (0.952) |
Z= -0.104+0.044Y(0.984) |
||
T9-Cultivated fallow |
Y= 0.97-0.104X+0.006X2 (0.955) |
Z=0.052 –0.01X+0.0003X2 (0.951) |
Z= -0.098+0.05Y(0.996) |
Table 7 Relation between Rainfall (X)mm, Runoff(Y)mm and Soil loss (Z) t/ha in different treatments along with co-efficient of determination (2007-08)
Treatments |
Relations |
|
|
|
|
Rainfall(X) mm & Runoff(Y)mm (Co.det.) |
Rainfall(X)mm & soil loss(Z) t/ha (Co.det) |
Runoff(Y)mm & soil loss(Z)t/ha (Co.det) |
|||
T1 – Rc Sole |
Y=-0.5+0.156X+0.002X2 (0.975) |
Z= -0.019+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.973) |
Z= -0.075+0.041Y(0.993) |
||
T2- Pp Sole |
Y=-0.432+0.152X+0.002X2 (0.975) |
Z= -0.019+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.974) |
Z= -0.077+0.042Y(0.994) |
||
T3-Gn Sole |
Y=-0.414+0.14X+0.002X2 (0.975) |
Z= -0.017+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.967) |
Z= -0.078+0.041Y(0.991) |
||
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
Y= -0.532+0.15X+0.002X2 (0.977) |
Z= -0.01+0.002X+0.0001X2 (0.976) |
Z= -0.075+0.042Y(0.993) |
||
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
Y= -0.531+0.15X+0.002X2 (0.977) |
Z= -0.018+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.976) |
Z= -0.075+0.042Y(0.993) |
||
T6-Rc+Pp (5:2) intercropping |
Y= -0.571+0.15X+0.002X2 (0.974) |
Z= -0.018+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.973) |
Z= -0.074+0.042Y(0.993) |
||
T7-Gn+Pp (4:2)intercropping |
Y= -0.513+0.136X+0.002X2 (0.972) |
Z= -0.018+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.961) |
Z= -0.081+0.041Y(0.99) |
||
T8-Uncultivated fallow |
Y= -0.1+0.14X+0.004X2 (0.976) |
Z= -0.018+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.974) |
Z= -0.083+0.042Y(0.996) |
||
T9-Cultivated fallow |
Y= -0.2+0.14X+0.003X2 (0.967) |
Z= -0.018+0.003X+0.0001X2 (0.693) |
Z= -0.097+0.052Y(0.997) |
Table 8 Relation between Rainfall (X)mm, Runoff(Y)mm and Soil loss (Z) t/ha in different treatments along with co-efficient of determination (2008-09)
Treatments |
Relations |
|
|
|
|
Rainfall(X) mm & Runoff(Y)mm (Co.det.) |
Rainfall(X)mm & soil loss(Z) t/ha (Co.det) |
Runoff(Y)mm & soil loss(Z)t/ha (Co.det) |
|||
T1 – Rc Sole |
Y=-1.33+0.384X+0.00004X2 (0.982) |
Z= -0.036+0.007X+0.00004X2 (0.985) |
Z= -0.082+0.031Y(0.979) |
||
T2- Pp Sole |
Y=-1.35+0.387X+0.00003X2 (0.984) |
Z= -0.036+0.007X+0.00004X2 (0.987) |
Z= -0.082+0.031Y(0.98) |
||
T3-Gn Sole |
Y=-1.39+0.391X-0.00008X2 (0.981) |
Z= -0.037+0.007X+0.00003X2 (0.984) |
Z= -0.085+0.031Y(0.979) |
||
T4-Pp & Rc strip cropping |
Y= -1.47+0.392X-0.0002X2 (0.973) |
Z= -0.41+0.007X+0.00003X2 (0.975) |
Z= -0.092+0.031Y(0.979) |
||
T5- Pp & Gn strip cropping |
Y= -1.53+0.391X-0.0002X2 (0.975) |
Z= -0.041+0.007X+0.00003X2 (0.978) |
Z= -0.075+0.03Y(0.976) |
||
T6-Rc+Pp (5:2) intercropping |
Y= -1.57+0.394X-0.0004X2 (0.974) |
Z= -0.045+0.008X+0.0000001X2 (0.907) |
Z= -0.041+0.024Y(0.921) |
||
T7-Gn+Pp (4:2)intercropping |
Y= -1.59+0.388X-0.0004X2 (0.968) |
Z= -0.039+0.007X+0.000002X2 (0.900) |
Z= -0.046+0.024Y(0.922) |
||
T8-Uncultivated fallow |
Y= -1.23+0.387X+0.0003X2 (0.983) |
Z= -0.042+0.009X+0.00007X2 (0.985) |
Z= -0.127+0.041Y(0.975) |
||
T9-Cultivated fallow |
Y= -1.23+0.414X+0.0003X2 (0.972) |
Z= -0.054+0.011X+0.00006X2 (0.972) |
Z= -0.116+0.041Y(0.986) |
Table 9 Relation between Rainfall (X)mm, Runoff(Y)mm and Soil loss (Z) t/ha in different treatments along with co-efficient of determination (2009-10)
Thus it can be concluded that intercropping of groundnut with pigeon pea planted along contour may be practiced to increase crop yield and lowering the soil loss and runoff in the hilly tribal areas of Kandhamal district. The relationship among rainfall, runoff and soil loss was found out which can be used to predict the runoff and soil loss from rainfall for same type of soil condition and slope.
Author acknowledge the help of scientists of AICRPDA and staffs, Vice Chancellor, OUAT, Dean of Research, OUAT for time to time guidance. Author also acknowledge the help of P.C, AICRPDA, CRIDA, Hyderabad for all types of help.
©2016 Subudhi, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
2 7