
 
 
Research Article Volume 5 Issue 4
     
 
	Discrete shanker distribution and its derived distributions
 Munindra Borah, Junali Hazarika  
    
 
   
    
    
  
    
    
   
      
      
        
        Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.
        
        
 
 
 
          
     
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
       
     
   
 
    
    
  
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tezpur University, India
Correspondence: Junali Hazarika, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tezpur University, Napaam, Tezpur, Assam, India
Received: January 26, 2017 | Published: April 7, 2017
Citation: Borah M, Hazarika J. Discrete shanker distribution and its derived distributions. Biom Biostat Int J. 2017;5(4):146-153. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00140
 Download PDF
        
       
   
Introduction
  One  parameter continuous Shanker distribution introduced by Shanker (2015 b) with  parameter  is defined by  its probability density function (pdf).
    (1.1)
 
Discretization of continuous distribution
  Discretization  of continuous distribution can be done using different methodologies. In this  paper we deal with the derivation of a new discrete distribution which takes  values in 
 .  This new distribution is generated by discretizing the continuous survival function  of the Shanker distribution, which is may be obtained as
 
 
  (2.1) 
(2.2)
  The  probability mass function (pmf) of discrete Shanker distribution may be  obtained as 
   
(2.3)
  Probability  recurrence relation 
  Probability  recurrence relation of discrete Shanker distribution may be obtained as
    (2.5) 
  Where   
   ,  and 
  
  (2.6) 
Factorial  moment recurrence relation  
Factorial moment generating function (fmgf) may be  obtained as 
  =   
      (2.7) 
   The more general form of factorial moment may  also be written as
      
    (2.8) 
 
Size- biased discrete shanker (SBDJ) distribution
  If a random variable
 have discrete Shanker distribution with parameter   
   then  the pmf of the size-biased distribution may be derived as 
  
 ,  
    (3.1) 
    Where  
    and   
    denote respectively pmf and the mean of discrete Shanker  distribution.  
    The pmf  
   of size- biased discrete Shanker distribution with  parameters   
   may be derived from (3.1) as 
   
   
 (3.2) 
 
  
Recurrence relation of size- biased discrete shanker distribution
  Probability  generating function
for Size- biased Discrete Shanker Distribution may be  obtained as   
       
 (3.3) 
  Probability  recurrence relation for size- biased discrete   shanker distribution
  Probability  recurrence relation of Size- biased Discrete Shanker Distribution distribution  may be obtained as 
  
 for  
   (3.4) 
    where 
    and (3.5) 
  Factorial  moment recurrence relation for size- biased discrete  shanker distribution
  Factorial  moment generating function   
   of Size- biased discrete Shanker distribution may be  obtained as 
   
 (3.6)
  More general form    
      (3.7) 
  Factorial  moment recurrence relation of Size- biased discrete Shanker distribution may be  obtained as 
      
  (3.7) 
    Where 
  
 
   
(3.8)
  
 
 
  
Method of estimation of shanker distribution
  The parameter 
 of Shanker distribution has  been estimated using Newton’s –Raphson method by considering appropriate  initial guest value for  
. The function of   
 can be expressed as
 
Fitting of discrete shanker  distribution
  Shanker et al.1 fitted Poisson  distribution (PD), Poisson- Lindley distribution (PLD) and Poisson-Akash  distribution (PAD) to eleven numbers of data sets covering ecology, genetics  and thunderstorms. In this investigation discrete Shanker (DS) distribution has  been fitted to all 11 data sets have been considered for a comparison (Tables 1-11).2-36
 
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square  | 
      Observed  | 
      Expected frequency  | 
    
    
      frequency  | 
      DS  | 
      PD  | 
      PLD  | 
      PAD  | 
    
    
      0  | 
      213  | 
      213  | 
      202.1  | 
      234  | 
      236.8  | 
    
    
      1  | 
      128  | 
      109.15  | 
      138  | 
      99.4  | 
      95.6  | 
    
    
      2  | 
      37  | 
      47.44  | 
      47.1  | 
      40.5  | 
      39.9  | 
    
    
      3  | 
      18  | 
      19  | 
      10.7  | 
      16  | 
      16.6  | 
    
    
      4  | 
      3  | 
      7.25  | 
      1.8  | 
      6.2  | 
      6.7  | 
    
    
      5  | 
      1  | 
      2.67  | 
      0.2  | 
      2.4  | 
      2.7  | 
    
    
      6  | 
      0  | 
      1.48  | 
      0.1  | 
      1.5  | 
      1.7  | 
    
    
      Total  | 
      400  | 
      400  | 
      400  | 
      400  | 
      400  | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
  | 
      1.1621  | 
      0.6825  | 
      1.950236  | 
      2.260342  | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      7.89 | 
      10.08  | 
      11.04  | 
      14.68  | 
    
    
      d.f.  | 
      3 | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
    
    
      p- vale  | 
      0.0468 | 
      0.0065  | 
      0.004  | 
      0.0006  | 
    
  
  Table 1 Observed and expected number of Homocytometer yeast cell counts per square observed by Gosset
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square  | 
      Observed  | 
      Expected frequency  | 
    
    
      frequency  | 
      DS  | 
      PD  | 
      PLD  | 
      PAD  | 
    
    
      0  | 
      38  | 
      38  | 
      25.3  | 
      35.8  | 
      36.3  | 
    
    
      1  | 
      17  | 
      22.4  | 
      29.1  | 
      20.7  | 
      20.1  | 
    
    
      2  | 
      10  | 
      11.02  | 
      16.7  | 
      11.4  | 
      11.2  | 
    
    
      3  | 
      9  | 
      4.97  | 
      6.4  | 
      6  | 
      6.1  | 
    
    
      4  | 
      3  | 
      2.13  | 
      1.8  | 
      3.1  | 
      3.2  | 
    
    
      5  | 
      2  | 
      0.88  | 
      0.4  | 
      1.6  | 
      1.6  | 
    
    
      6  | 
      1  | 
      0.36  | 
      0.2  | 
      0.8  | 
      0.8  | 
    
    
      7  | 
      0  | 
      0.14  | 
      0.1  | 
      0.6  | 
      0.7  | 
    
    
      Total  | 
      80  | 
      80  | 
      80  | 
      80  | 
      80  | 
    
    
       | 
      Estimated 
  | 
      1.0494  | 
      1.15  | 
      1.255891  | 
      1.620588  | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      6.246  | 
      18.27  | 
      2.47  | 
      2.07  | 
    
    
      d.f.  | 
      4  | 
      2  | 
      3  | 
      3  | 
    
    
      p- vale  | 
      0.1815  | 
      0.0001  | 
      0.4807  | 
      0.558  | 
    
  
  Table 2 Observed and expected number of red mites on Apple leaves
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square  | 
      Observed  | 
      Expected frequency  | 
    
    
      frequency  | 
      DS  | 
      PD  | 
      PLD  | 
      PAD  | 
    
    
      0  | 
      188  | 
      187.98  | 
      169.4  | 
      194  | 
      196.3  | 
    
    
      1  | 
      83  | 
      85.03  | 
      109.8  | 
      79.5  | 
      76.5  | 
    
    
      2  | 
      36  | 
      33.03  | 
      35.6  | 
      31.3  | 
      30.8  | 
    
    
      3  | 
      14  | 
      11.88  | 
      7.8  | 
      12  | 
      12.4  | 
    
    
      4  | 
      2  | 
      4.07  | 
      1.2  | 
      4.5  | 
      4.9  | 
    
    
      5  | 
      1  | 
      1.99  | 
      0.2  | 
      2.7  | 
      3.1  | 
    
    
      Total  | 
      324  | 
      324  | 
      324  | 
      324  | 
      324  | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
  | 
      1.2644  | 
      0.648148  | 
      2.043252  | 
      2.345109  | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      0.367  | 
      15.19  | 
      1.29  | 
      2.33  | 
    
    
      d.f.  | 
      3  | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
    
    
      p- vale  | 
      0.9470  | 
      0.0005  | 
      0.5247  | 
      0.3119  | 
    
  
  Table 3 Observed and expected number of European corn-border of McGuire et al
  
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      268  | 
      268  | 
      231.3  | 
      257  | 
      260.4  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      87  | 
      87  | 
      92.8  | 
      126.7  | 
      93.4  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      26  | 
      28.23  | 
      34.7  | 
      32.8  | 
      32.1  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      9  | 
      8.01  | 
      6.3  | 
      11.2  | 
      11.5  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      4  | 
      2.18  | 
      0.8  | 
      3.8  | 
      4.1  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      2  | 
      0.58  | 
      0.1  | 
      1.2  | 
      1.4  | 
    
    
      6   | 
      1  | 
      0.15  | 
      0.1  | 
      0.4  | 
      0.5  | 
    
    
      7   | 
      3  | 
      0.05  | 
      0.1  | 
      0.2  | 
      0.3  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      400   | 
      400   | 
      400   | 
      400   | 
      400   | 
    
    
       | 
      Estimated 
       
  | 
      1.4870 | 
      0.5475   | 
      2.380442   | 
      2.659408   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      6.417 | 
      38.21   | 
      6.21   | 
      4.17   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      3 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.0930 | 
      0   | 
      0.1018   | 
      0.2437   | 
    
  
  Table 4 Distribution of number of Chromatid aberrations
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      413  | 
      413.01  | 
      374  | 
      405.7  | 
      409.5  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      124  | 
      134.97  | 
      177.4  | 
      133.6  | 
      128.7  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      42  | 
      38.92  | 
      42.1  | 
      42.6  | 
      42.1  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      15  | 
      10.49  | 
      6.6  | 
      13.3  | 
      13.9  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      5  | 
      2.71  | 
      0.8  | 
      4.1  | 
      4.6  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      0  | 
      0.68  | 
      0.1  | 
      1.2  | 
      1.5  | 
    
    
      6   | 
      2  | 
      0.22  | 
      0  | 
      0.5  | 
      0.7  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      601   | 
      601   | 
      601   | 
      601   | 
      601   | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
        
  | 
      1.5385 | 
      0.47421   | 
      2.685373   | 
      2.915059   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      5.562 | 
      48.17   | 
      1.34   | 
      0.29   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      3 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.1350 | 
      0   | 
      0.7196   | 
      0.9619   | 
    
  
  Table 5 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-60
    
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square  | 
      Observed  | 
      Expected frequency  | 
    
    
      frequency  | 
      DS  | 
      PD  | 
      PLD  | 
      PAD  | 
    
    
      0  | 
      200  | 
      200.01  | 
      172.5  | 
      191.8  | 
      194.1  | 
    
    
      1  | 
      57  | 
      70.01  | 
      95.4  | 
      70.3  | 
      67.6  | 
    
    
      2  | 
      30  | 
      21.51  | 
      26.4  | 
      24.9  | 
      24.5  | 
    
    
      3  | 
      7  | 
      6.17  | 
      4.9  | 
      8.6  | 
      8.9  | 
    
    
      4  | 
      4  | 
      1.69  | 
      0.7  | 
      2.9  | 
      3.2  | 
    
    
      5  | 
      0  | 
      0.45  | 
      0.1  | 
      1  | 
      1.1  | 
    
    
      6  | 
      2  | 
      0.16  | 
      0  | 
      0.5  | 
      0.6  | 
    
    
      Total  | 
      300  | 
      300  | 
      300  | 
      300  | 
      300  | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
  | 
      1.4798  | 
      0.55333  | 
      2.35334  | 
      2.62674  | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      8.191  | 
      29.68  | 
      3.91  | 
      3.12  | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      3  | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
      2  | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.0422  | 
      0  | 
      0.1415  | 
      0.2101  | 
    
  
  Table 6 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-75
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      155  | 
      155.01  | 
      127.8  | 
      158.3  | 
      160.7  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      83  | 
      82.63  | 
      109  | 
      77.2  | 
      74.3  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      33  | 
      37.2  | 
      46.5  | 
      35.9  | 
      35.3  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      14  | 
      15.41  | 
      13.2  | 
      16.1  | 
      16.5  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      11  | 
      6.08  | 
      2.8  | 
      7.1  | 
      7.5  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      3  | 
      2.32  | 
      0.5  | 
      3.1  | 
      3.3  | 
    
    
      6   | 
      1  | 
      1.35  | 
      0.2  | 
      2.3  | 
      2.4  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      300   | 
      300   | 
      300   | 
      300   | 
      300   | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
        
  | 
      1.1301 | 
      0.853333   | 
      1.617611   | 
      1.963313   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      3.432 | 
      24.97   | 
      1.51   | 
      1.98   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      4 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.4883 | 
      0   | 
      0.6799   | 
      0.5766   | 
    
  
  Table 7 Mammalian cytogenetic dosimetry lesions in rabbit lymphoblast induced by streptonigrin (NSC-45383), Exposure-90
  
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      187  | 
      187.01  | 
      155.6  | 
      185.3  | 
      187.9  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      77  | 
      87.72  | 
      117  | 
      83.5  | 
      80.2  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      40  | 
      35.21  | 
      43.9  | 
      35.9  | 
      35.3  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      17  | 
      13.07  | 
      11  | 
      15  | 
      15.4  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      6  | 
      4.62  | 
      2.1  | 
      6.1  | 
      6.6  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      2  | 
      1.58  | 
      0.3  | 
      2.5  | 
      2.7  | 
    
    
      6   | 
      1  | 
      0.79  | 
      0.1  | 
      1.7  | 
      1.9  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      330   | 
      330   | 
      330   | 
      330   | 
      330   | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
        
  | 
      1.2345 | 
      0.751515   | 
      1.804268   | 
      2.139736   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      3.721 | 
      31.93   | 
      1.43   | 
      1.35   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      4 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
  
  Table 8 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of June, January 1957 to December 1967
  
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      177  | 
      177.01  | 
      142.3  | 
      177.7  | 
      180  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      80  | 
      93.79  | 
      124.4  | 
      88  | 
      84.7  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      47  | 
      42.01  | 
      54.3  | 
      41.5  | 
      40.9  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      26  | 
      17.32  | 
      15.8  | 
      18.9  | 
      19.4  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      9  | 
      7.79  | 
      3.5  | 
      8.4  | 
      8.9  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      2  | 
      3.08  | 
      0.7  | 
      6.5  | 
      7.1  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
    
    
       | 
      Estimated 
        
  | 
      1.1348 | 
      0.8739   | 
      1.583536   | 
      1.938989   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      6.972 | 
      39.74   | 
      5.15   | 
      5.02   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      4 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.1374 | 
      0   | 
      0.1611   | 
      0.1703   | 
    
  
  Table 9 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of July, January 1957 to December 1967
  
 
 
 
    
          No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      185  | 
      184.99  | 
      151.8  | 
      184.8  | 
      187.5  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      89  | 
      92.42  | 
      122.9  | 
      87.2  | 
      83.9  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      30  | 
      39.27  | 
      49.7  | 
      39.3  | 
      38.6  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      24  | 
      15.39  | 
      13.4  | 
      17.1  | 
      17.5  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      10  | 
      6.74  | 
      2.7  | 
      7.3  | 
      7.6  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      3  | 
      2.19  | 
      0.5  | 
      5.3  | 
      5.9  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
      341   | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
  | 
      1.1828 | 
      0.809384   | 
      1.693425   | 
      2.038417   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      8.987 | 
      49.49   | 
      5.03   | 
      4.69   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      4 | 
      2   | 
      3   | 
      3   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.0414 | 
      0   | 
      0.1696   | 
      0.196   | 
    
  
  Table 10 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for the month of August, January 1957 to December 1967
  
 
 
 
    
      No. of yeast cell per square   | 
      Observed   | 
      Expected frequency   | 
    
    
      frequency   | 
      DS   | 
      PD   | 
      PLD   | 
      PAD   | 
    
    
      0   | 
      549  | 
      549.01  | 
      449  | 
      547.5  | 
      555.1  | 
    
    
      1   | 
      246  | 
      274.27  | 
      364.8  | 
      259  | 
      249.2  | 
    
    
      2   | 
      117  | 
      117  | 
      116.54  | 
      148.2  | 
      116.9  | 
    
    
      3   | 
      67  | 
      45.67  | 
      40.1  | 
      51.2   | 
      52.3  | 
    
    
      4   | 
      25  | 
      17.04  | 
      8.1  | 
      21.9  | 
      23.2  | 
    
    
      5   | 
      7  | 
      7.16  | 
      1.3  | 
      9.2  | 
      10  | 
    
    
      6   | 
      1  | 
      2.31  | 
      0.5  | 
      6.3  | 
      7.3  | 
    
    
      Total   | 
      1012   | 
      1012   | 
      1012   | 
      1012   | 
      1012   | 
    
    
         | 
      Estimated 
     
  | 
      1.1828 | 
      0.812253   | 
      1.68899   | 
      2.033715   | 
    
     
    
      
  | 
      16.824 | 
      119.45   | 
      9.6   | 
      9.4   | 
    
    
      d.f.   | 
      5 | 
      3   | 
      4   | 
      4   | 
    
    
      p- vale   | 
      0.0048 | 
      0   | 
      0.0477   | 
      0.0518  | 
    
  
  Table 11 Observed abd expected number of days that experienced X thunderstroms event at Cape Kennedy, Florida for 11-year period of record for Summer, January 1957 to December 1967
  
 
 
 
 
Conclusions
  In  this article, the discrete Shanker distribution has been introduced by  discretizing the continuous Shanker distribution. We have studied some  properties of the distributions. Further the applications of the distribution  and goodness of fit of the distribution. 
 
  
Acknowledgments
 Conflicts of interest
  
References
  
    - Shanker R. Amarendra distribution and its  applications. American journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2016;6(1):44–56.
 
    - Adhikari  TR, Srivastava RS. A size-biased poisson-lindley distribution. International Journal of Mathematical  Modeling and Physical Sciences. 2013;1(3):1–5. 
 
    - Adhikari  TR, Srivastava RS. Poisson-size-biased lindley distribution. International  Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. 2014;4(3):1–6. 
 
    - Borah M.The Genenbauer  distribution revisited: Some recurrence relation for moments, cumulants, etc.,  estimation of parameters and its goodness of fit. Journal of Indian Society  of Agricultural Statistics. 1984;36(1):72–78.
 
    - Borah M,  Begum R. Some properties of Poisson-Lindley and its derive distributions. Journal of the Indian Statistical  Association. 2000;4:13–25. 
 
    - Borah M, Deka Nath A. A study on the inflated poisson lindley distribution. Journal  of Indian Soc. Ag. Statistics.  2001;54(3) 317–323.
 
    - Dutta P, Bora M. Some properties and application of  size-biased poisson- lindley distribution. International Journal of  Mathematical Archive. 2014a;5(1):89–96.
 
    - Dutta P,  Borah M. Zero-modified poisson-lindley distribution. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. (2014b);79(3):279–287. 
 
    - Fisher  RA. The effects of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequency. Ann  Eugenics. 1934;6(1):13–25.
 
    - Ghitany ME, Atiech B, Nadarajah S. Lindley  distribution and its applications, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. (2008a);78(4):493–506.
 
    - Ghitany ME, Al-Mutari DK. Size-biased  Poisson - lindley distribution and its application. Metron-International  Journal of Statistics LXVI. 2008b;(3):299–311.
 
    - Ghitany ME, Al-Mutairi DK. Estimation methods  for the discrete Poisson-Lindley distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2009;79(1) 1–9.
 
    - Gomez-Deniz E. Another generalization of the  geometric distribution. Test. 2010;19(2):399–415.
 
    - Gove HJ. Estimation and  application of size-biased distributions in forestry. In: Amaro & D. Reed, editors. Modeling Forest systems A. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.  2003;201–212.
 
    - Johnson NL,  Kemp AW, Kotz S. Univariate discrete  distributions. Hoboken NJ and John  Wiley & Sons, USA; 2005.. 
 
    - Kemp AW. The discrete half-normal distribution.  MA Advances in Mathematical and  Statistical Modelling. Birkhauser, Boston, USA; 2008:353–365. 
 
    - Krishna H, Pundir PS. Discrete Burr and  discrete pareto distributions. Stat Methodol. 2009;6:177–188.
 
    - Lappi J, Bailey  RL. Estimation of diameter increment function or other relations using  angle-count samples. Forest Science. 1987;33:725–739. 
 
    - Lindley DV. Fiducial distributions and Bayes’ theorem. Journal of the  Royal Statistical Society, Series B.  1958;20(1):102–107.
 
    - Mahmoudi E, Zakerzadeh H. Generalized poisson  lindley distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 2010; 39(10):1785–1798.
 
    - Marshall AW, Olkin I. A new method for adding a  parameter to a family of distributions with application to the exponential and  Weibull families. Biometrika.  1997;84(3):641–652.
 
    - Nakagawa T,  Osaki S.The discrete Weibull distribution. IEE Trans Reliab. 1975;24(5):300–301. 
 
    - Patil  GP, Ord JK. On size-biased sampling and related form-invariant weighted  distributions. Sankhya. 1975;38(1):48–61.
 
    - Patil GP,  Rao CR. The weighted distributions: a survey and their applications. In  Applications of Statistics. 1977;383–405. 
 
    - Patil GP,  Rao CR. Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to  wild life populations and human families. Biometrics. 1978;34:179–189. 
 
    - Rao CR. On  discrete distributions arising out of methods on ascertainment, classical and contagious discrete  distribution. In: Patil GP, editor. Statistical  Publishing Society. 1965;320-332. 
 
    - Roy D. Discrete  rayleigh distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab.  2004;53(2):255–260. 
 
    - Sankaran M.  The discrete poisson-lindley distribution. Biometrics.  1970;26:145–149. 
 
    - Shanker R,  Mishra A. A two parameter poisson- lindley distribution. International  journal of Statistics and Systems.  2014;9(1): 79–85.
 
    - Shanker R. Shanker distribution and its  Applications. International Journal of Statistics and Applications. 2015;5(6):338–348.
 
    - Shanker R, Mishra A. A quasi Lindley  distribution. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research. 2013; 6(4):64–71.
 
    - Shanke R,  Sharma S, Shanker R. A discrete two-parameter poisson-lindley distribution. Journal  of the Ethiopian Statistical Association.  2012;21:15–22. 
 
    - Shanke R,  Sharma S, Shanker R. Janardan distribution and its applications to waiting  times data. Indian Journal of Applied research. 2013;3(8):500–502. 
 
    - Shanker R,  Tekie Asehun Leonida. A new quasi poisson- lindley distribution. International  Journal of Statistics and Systems.  2014;9(1):87–94. 
 
    - Shanke, R, Sharma S, Shanker R, et al. The  discrete Poisson- Janardan distribution with applications. International  Journal of Soft Computing and  Engineering. 2014;4(2):31–33.
 
    - Van  Deusen PC. Fitting assumed distributions to horizontal point sample Diameters. Forest  Science. 1986;32(1):146–148.
 
  
 
  
  ©2017 Borah, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, 
 which 
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.